I Reading Paper on Earth Occultation Technique

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Earth Occultation Technique used in the Burst and Transient Source Experiment, specifically addressing the derivation of equations for occultation times found in Appendix B. There is a concern that some derivation steps may be missing and a request for sources where these equations might have been previously established. The completeness of Appendix B is debated, with some asserting it adequately assumes a spherical Earth and known satellite positioning, while others find Appendix C lacking, particularly regarding the WGS84 ellipsoid model. Recommendations for software tools like Starlink and SLALIB are provided for more accurate positional astronomy calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity and completeness in the technical derivations related to this observational technique.
yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
I was reading a paper and I need help with the derivations of the equations for occultation timing. Where were these equations first derived?

The Burst and Transient Source Experiment Earth Occultation Technique​

https://www.semanticscholar.org/pap...hman/b4e57f91de6fec73fa680bcd7d6efbdf0de10bee

In **Appendix B**, the authors derive the equations for the occultation times. However, it appears that many steps were left out. I suspect that these equations were first derived elsewhere. Do you happen to know where? I have tried looking into the citations in the last paragraph of the **Introduction**, but to no avail (maybe I did not look carefully enough?) It might possibly be located in the Proceedings to the Gamma Ray Observatory Science Workshop...

Thanks in advance!

P.S. I am just trying my luck here {:-)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Appendix B seems fairly complete to me. It assumes the Earth is a sphere and that seen from a satellite the Earth hides a circular area of sky. Since the position of the satellite relative to the Earth is known, the centre of the circular occultation is known. The height of the satellite decides the angular diameter of the occultation. The target, at an infinite range, effectively crosses the circle along a chord that probably never passes through the centre of the circle.

It is Appendix C that I find less complete. Since the WGS84 ellipsoid for the Earth is then being considered, I would use Starlink, or SLALIB: A Positional Astronomy Library;
http://www.ascl.net/1403.025
https://github.com/Starlink/starlink

Your observatory organisation probably has a license for a fully maintained version of the software system.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top