Real Analysis: closed sets and limit points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of closed sets and limit points in real analysis. A bounded subset A of R, exemplified by (0,1) ∪ {7}, demonstrates that the supremum (sup A) is not a limit point of A. In contrast, the participants conclude that a finite subset of R cannot be non-closed, as any set without limit points is inherently closed by definition. The reasoning hinges on the definition of limit points and epsilon neighborhoods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit points in topology
  • Familiarity with bounded and unbounded sets in real analysis
  • Knowledge of epsilon neighborhoods and their role in defining limits
  • Basic concepts of closed and open sets in metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of limit points in topology
  • Explore the characteristics of closed sets in metric spaces
  • Investigate examples of bounded and unbounded sets in R
  • Learn about epsilon-delta definitions in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, topology, or anyone interested in the properties of sets and limit points.

Askhwhelp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
For the following example:(if possible give example or just state impossible

1) a bounded subset A of R for which sup A is not a limit point of A. An example is (0,1) union {7}. will this work?

2) a finite subset A of R that is not closed
I think it is not possible. Please give some hints if you think there is an answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Askhwhelp said:
For the following example:(if possible give example or just state impossible

1) a bounded subset A of R for which sup A is not a limit point of A. An example is (0,1) union {7}. will this work?

2) a finite subset A of R that is not closed
I think it is not possible. Please give some hints if you think there is an answer

1) works fine. For 2), can you think of a proof that nobody will be able to come up with an example?
 
Last edited:
Wait ... why is ##7## not a limit point of ##(0,1)\cup\{7\}##?
 
Since not all epilson nbhd of 7 intersects the subset other than 7 which violates the definition of limit
 
If a set has no limit points, then by definition it is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K