MHB Real Roots of Composite Polynomials: Solving P(Q(x))=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $P(x)=x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}+b$ and $Q(x)=x^2+cx+d$ be two polynomials with real coefficients such that $P(x)Q(x)=Q(P(x))$ for all real $x$. Find all real roots of $P(Q(x))=0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since $P(x)$ divides $Q(P(x))=(P(x))^2+cP(x)+d$, it follows that $P(x)$ divides $d$ and hence $d=0$. Thus $P(x)Q(x)=P(x)^2+cP(x)$ and hence $Q(x)=P(x)+c$. This gives $c=Q(x)-P(x)=\left(c-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)x-b$ and thus $c=\dfrac{1}{2}$ and $b=c=-\dfrac{1}{2}$. Consequently, $P(x)=x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}-\dfrac{1}{2}$ and $Q(x)=x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}$ and

$\begin{align*}P(Q(x))&=\left(x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}\right)^2+\dfrac{1}{2}\left(x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}\right)-\dfrac{1}{2}\\&=\dfrac{1}{4}(4x^4+4x^3+3x^2+x-2)\end{align*}$

Clearly $P(Q(-1))=0$ and any other rational root will be $\pm\dfrac{1}{4},\,\pm \dfrac{1}{2}$. Of these, $\dfrac{1}{2}$ is a root. The remaining factor is $h(x)=x^2+\dfrac{x}{2}+1$ and this has no real roots.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top