Real Sequences : Can some terms be undefined?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Legendre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences Terms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of sequences of real numbers, particularly focusing on cases where some terms may be undefined. Participants explore how to handle sequences like (1/log n) and (An/Bn) when certain terms do not have valid real values, addressing implications for limits and series summation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines a sequence of real numbers as a function from N to R and questions whether undefined terms violate this definition.
  • Another participant suggests that undefined terms can be dropped from a sequence or that initial terms can be removed until all remaining terms are defined, asserting that this will not change the limit.
  • A participant requests sources for the information provided regarding the treatment of undefined terms in sequences.
  • Concerns are raised about how the sum of a series defined by (An/Bn) would depend on whether initial terms or just undefined terms are dropped.
  • It is noted that dropping terms depends on the context of the analysis, particularly for limits where initial terms may not matter.
  • One participant emphasizes that "undefined" is an informal term and explains that a limit cannot be defined for sequences with undefined terms, but dropping finite terms does not affect the limit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the handling of undefined terms in sequences and series, with no consensus on a "standard way" to approach the issue. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for dealing with undefined terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the term "undefined" is informal and that the treatment of such terms may depend on specific definitions and contexts within mathematical analysis.

Legendre
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
The definition of a sequence of real numbers is : a function from N to R.

What is the standard way to handle a sequence like (1/log n) where the first term is undefined? Do we instead write (1/log (n+1)) so that the first term is defined? Or leave the first term undefined?

The definition says that the function must map from N to R. So every element in N needs to have a valid image. Would undefined terms violate this definition? E.g. f(1) = (1/log 1) do not exists.


What happens when we have the sequence (An/Bn) where (An) and (Bn) are two convergent sequences with non-zero limits? Some of the terms of (An/Bn) might be undefined due to Bn being 0. Do we drop just those terms or drop the initial terms until all remaining terms are defined?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, undefined terms are not members of R. But, yes, we can just drop any "undefined" terms from a sequence or drop initial terms until there are no more "undefined" terms. It will not change the limit. You can drop any finite number of terms from a sequence without changing the limit.
 
Thank you! But...

1) Can you post the source of your information? (textbook etc) I looked through a few intro to analysis text but didn't come across the treatment of undefined terms.

2) Suppose we define a series using the sequence of the form (An/Bn) where (An) and (Bn) are sequences and the limit of (Bn) is not zero.

If some An/Bn terms are undefined then the sum of the series would depend on whether we drop initial terms or just drop the undefined terms.

But which is the "standard way" of doing it?
 
Whether you can "drop" terms depends on what you want to do. For example, to do a limit, the first few terms do not matter.
 
Legendre said:
1) Can you post the source of your information? (textbook etc) I looked through a few intro to analysis text but didn't come across the treatment of undefined terms.

"Undefined" is an informal term. Strictly speaking, a limit cannot be defined by (1/log n) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... because log isn't defined at 0.

However, as Halls said, you can drop any finite number of terms from a series (your "undefined" terms) and the series maintains its limit.

The reason for this comes from the definition of a limit.

A number L is the limit of a sequence (s_i) iff for all real e > 0, you can find a natural number n such that when i > n, |s_i - L| < e.

If you drop anyone term from the sequence, you simply have to choose a value one greater for n. And because you can drop one term, you can repeat the process a finite number of times to get the same results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K