MHB Real Solutions for 4x^2-40x+51=0 and 4x^2-40[x]+51=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding real solutions for the equation 4x^2 - 40⌊x⌋ + 51 = 0, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting the floor function. Participants acknowledge a mistake in the initial approach and express appreciation for contributions to the problem-solving process. The equation requires consideration of integer values for ⌊x⌋, leading to a systematic exploration of potential solutions. The conversation highlights collaborative problem-solving in mathematical contexts. Ultimately, the goal is to identify all valid real solutions for the given quadratic equation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all real solutions for the system $$4x^2-40\left\lfloor{x}\right\rfloor+51=0$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find all real solutions for the system $$4x^2-40\left\lfloor{x}\right\rfloor+51=0$$.

First $4x^2+ 51$ is positive. So x has to be positive else the sum is positive
we have $4x^2 - 40 \lfloor x \rfloor + 51 = 0$ => $4x^2 - 40 x + 51 <= 0$ equal only when x is integer and $4(x+1)^2 - 40 x + 51 >0$
$4x^2- 40 x + 51 < 0$
$=> 2(x-5)^2 < 49$
or $=> (x-5) < 3.5$
$=> x < 8.5$
$4(x+1)^2 - 40 x + 51 >0$
$=>4x^2 - 32 x + 55 >0$
$=>4(x - 4)^2 >9$
$=>x > 6.25$
So we seek solution for $\lfloor x \rfloor$ = 6 or 7 or 8
for $6 , 4x^2 = 240-51 = 189$ A solution
for $7, 4x^2 = 229$ A solution
for $8, 4x^2 = 269$ A solution
so solutions are $\frac{\sqrt{189}}{2},\frac{\sqrt{229}}{2}, \frac{\sqrt{269}}{2}$
 
Hi kaliprasad,

Nice try but the solutions aren't complete...:(
 
anemone said:
Hi kaliprasad,

Nice try but the solutions aren't complete...:(

you are right. my mistake

Forgot the solution to the left

$4(x-4)^2 > 9$ also gives $x < 2.5$
$2(x-5)^2 <49$ give $x > 1.5$
so take $\lfloor x\rfloor =2$ to get $4x^2 = 29$ which gives another solution $\frac{\sqrt{29}}{2}$
 
anemone said:
Find all real solutions for the system $$4x^2-40\left\lfloor{x}\right\rfloor+51=0$$.

As noted by kaliprasad, $x$ is positive.

If $m=\lfloor x\rfloor$ then $x=m+c$ for some $0\le c<1$, so we have

$$4(m+c)^2-40m+51=0$$

$$4m^2+8mc+4c^2-40m+51=0\implies4m^2-40m+51=-8mc-4c^2$$

As $m$ and $c$ are both positive, all possible $m$ are integers between the zeros of $4m^2-40m+51=0$.

This gives $m=2,3,4,5,6,7,8$ to check, so we have

$4x^2=29$
$4x^2=69$
$4x^2=109$
$4x^2=149$
$4x^2=189$
$4x^2=229$
$4x^2=269$

Solving the above equations for $x$ and substituting into the original equation we find solutions at

$$x\in\left\{\dfrac{\sqrt{29}}{2},\dfrac{\sqrt{189}}{2},\dfrac{\sqrt{229}}{2},\dfrac{\sqrt{269}}{2}\right\}$$
 
Good job to both of you! And thanks for participating!:cool:
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top