A Realizing EIT with Pulsed Laser: Intensity, Duration & Frequency

wangvivi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I have realized EIT with continuous laser. What are the requirements for the intensity, duration and repetition frequency if EIT is realized with pulsed laser?
I have realized EIT with continuous laser. What are the requirements for the intensity, duration and repetition frequency if EIT is realized with pulsed laser?
you can attach any reference:biggrin:thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The exact requirements for intensity, duration, and repetition frequency for EIT realized with pulsed laser will depend on the specific application and the characteristics of the system you are using. Generally, the intensity should be high enough to ensure that the stimulated transition is saturated, the pulse duration should be short enough to ensure that the atom-field interaction is adiabatic, and the repetition frequency should be low enough to ensure that the effect of spontaneous emission is minimized.For more details, you can refer to the following references:1. Zoubi, H., & Ritsch, H. (2011). Electromagnetically induced transparency. Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, 60, 1-66.2. Xiao, M., Gao, K., Li, X., & Sun, C. P. (2016). Electromagnetically induced transparency: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(7), 074401.3. Passante, R., & Persico, F. (2018). Electromagnetically induced transparency in dilute atomic media. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 12(2), 1700227.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top