Really good at math, but failing physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcruise322
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Failing Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by an engineering student in mastering physics despite having a strong background in mathematics. Participants explore the differences between studying math and physics, the impact of test anxiety, and strategies for improving understanding and performance in physics courses.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration over poor test performance in physics despite strong math skills and suggests that test anxiety may be a contributing factor.
  • Another participant recommends active studying techniques, such as re-solving problems independently and creating original examples, to enhance understanding of physics concepts.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that difficulties in physics may stem from challenges in transitioning to analytical thinking rather than a lack of understanding of physics itself.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of understanding the problem setup in physics, noting that this differs significantly from solving mathematical problems.
  • Concerns are raised about the relevance of comparing personal performance to class averages, with one participant arguing that individual progress is more important than class norms.
  • There is a suggestion that the nature of multiple-choice tests in physics may not adequately reflect a student's understanding, as insights often come from the problem-solving process rather than just the final answers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the approach to studying physics differs from that of mathematics, but there is no consensus on the best strategies for improvement or the primary causes of the student's difficulties. Multiple competing views on the impact of test anxiety and study methods remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for different skill sets in physics compared to mathematics, particularly in problem setup and interpretation. There is also mention of varying test formats and their implications for assessing understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineering students, particularly those struggling with physics courses, as well as educators looking for insights into student challenges in transitioning from mathematics to physics.

jcruise322
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I am an engineering student taking mechanics, and even though I feel like I understand the material, I still do badly on the tests. In fact, I was really excited about the midterm I just took, but I just found out that I got a 55 % on the multiple choice-I have yet to get above a 70% on a physics test. What is frustrating is that I started studying a week before, and I have a strong calculus background; I have finished the calc sequence and have never gotten lower than an 88% on a calc test. It is possible that I have a lot of test anxiety, because my heart is always pounding out of my chest when I take these tests. But still...I can't believe I am doing this badly in university calc-based physics! Can anyone relate? Is engineering just not for me? Should I retake mechanics? It's the end of the quarter now, and I know I won't get above a 3.2 in this course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may need to change the way you are studying. Do you study in an active way? For example, instead of just looking over solutions to worked problems, do you try to re-solve them on your own, without looking at the solutions?

Another example of active studying: Instead of reading the book and underlining this and that, making up your own examples and re-writing things in your own words. Yet another example: Working a problem from the book, then changing something about the problem and trying to work it again. It may seem intimidating to work a problem without knowing what the right answer is, but part of the physics skill-set is being able to judge the reasonableness of results in several different ways. In fact, in rare occasions the answer in the back of a book is wrong, and it's this skill that enables one to catch things like that.

Also, it's important to realize that physics differs from math in at least two respects. First, each physical situation has to be translated into mathematics. Second, once a solution has been reached mathematically, the result has to be interpreted - what does it mean physically? One can be great at calculating things but still not good at physics if either of these steps is neglected. Can you pinpoint where you tend to have problems?

Being nervous can definitely make things difficult. In fact, if you want to do well on a test even if you are nervous, then you have to work that much harder. I used to play guitar in front of people, a lot, and I had to know a song really, really darned well to be able to play in front of people without messing up. You wouldn't want to perform a song in front of people that it takes nearly all your effort to play when you are alone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: axmls
jcruise322,
How REALLY are you doing? Average score is what? Understand the homework? Understand the example descriptions and example problems in the book? Handle your lab class well? If you have problems in dealing with/learning Physics/Mechanics, first big introductory course of the series, the trouble is almost certainly with the Math and not so much the Physics. You might just be struggling with the transition to analytical thinking about applications of the relevant mathematics.
 
You need to look at those tests and see what you did wrong. If you really knew the right answer, then it is anxiety. If you knew the correct method but made careless mistakes, then you need to be more careful. If you didn't know the correct method, then you need to fix that.
 
@symbolipoint: The average score in the class does not matter. I only compare myself to myself, but if you must know, the test average in my class is a 60 on each test. I have perfect grades in my lab and quiz sections. Mostly just nerves, I think. I just get super stressed out whenever I take a physics test. And GoeFleur, I guess I need to more actively study. Thing is, I never have really needed to study hard for these kind of classes, but physics is not really coming easy to me. I am pretty frustrated and distraught at this point. Anyway, thanks for the input guys.
 
I agree with Geofleur, and should point out that the thought processes that go into a math problem and a physics problem can be entirely different. Basically, the physics part is setting up the problem, and the math part is actually solving it.

Setting up the problem is a whole different ballgame than solving a mathematical problem, but after you've set the problem up, the rest of the problem is usually just algebra/calculus. Example: once you set up your equations using a free body diagram, the rest is just math. The physics happened when you set up your equations.

So you need to practice setting up problems first and foremost. The math comes second.
 
jcruise322 said:
@symbolipoint: The average score in the class does not matter. I only compare myself to myself, but if you must know, the test average in my class is a 60 on each test. I have perfect grades in my lab and quiz sections. Mostly just nerves, I think. I just get super stressed out whenever I take a physics test. And GoeFleur, I guess I need to more actively study. Thing is, I never have really needed to study hard for these kind of classes, but physics is not really coming easy to me. I am pretty frustrated and distraught at this point. Anyway, thanks for the input guys.
It does matter, when you get into sections where everyone's average grade is a 30 or 40 percent on a exam. If you only look at you in this case you're going to become incredibly demoralized.

You're doing about average in the course, so there is no reason yet to be concerned about changing majors. Further, physics is not the same as engineering coursework, even though they're related greatly.

Your part about doing well in calculus is meaningless, if doing well in math was all that was needed to do well in physics, we wouldn't need physics classes would we? Solving physical problems requires a different tool set from what's used in math classes.Multiple choice tests in physics classes are bunk. The solutions in physics are typically not the most important part of doing physics. All the insights come from the work. If possible I would avoid this professor when you move onto E&M.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K