Rearranging a formula (segment area)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pavadrin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the minor angle of a segment of a circle given the segment area and the radius. The formula for the segment area is provided, and the original poster expresses confusion about rearranging the formula to isolate the angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for solving the problem, including graphing the functions involved and using derivatives. There is also mention of approximating the sine function for small angles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding potential methods, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the interpretation of the term "minor segment," with participants clarifying the distinction between minor and major segments in relation to the circle's arcs.

pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
I’ve been given a problem to solve involving the minor segment of a circle. I know that the formula to solve for a segment is:

[tex]S = \frac{1}{2}r^2 (\theta - \sin \theta )[/tex]

However in this problem I’ve been given the segment area and the radius of the circle and been ask to find the minor angle. So far the best I have managed in rearranging the formula is:

[tex]\theta - \sin \theta = \frac{{2S}}{{r^2 }}[/tex]

I am confused on what to do with the sin theta part, so if somebody out there is able to help it will be greatly appreciated. Or am I wasting my time and this is not possible?
Many thanks in advance
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only way I can fathom to solve this is to plot the graphs of theta and sin(theta) over the interval {0; pi} and read the answer off the graph.
 
okay thanks for that, didn't even consider graphing it :)
 
pavadrin said:
okay thanks for that, didn't even consider graphing it :)
You can use derivatives. If you have been given a function f(x). this function has a local minimum/maximum at those x values where [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex]. To be sure you are looking at a local minimum, you need to make a sign chart of the first derivative you just calculated. At those x-points when the sign of the [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex] changes from - to + , you are in a minimum.

In your case you have a function S of both r and [tex]\theta[/tex]. The [tex]\theta[/tex] corresponding to the minimum segment can be found by taking the first derivative of S with respect to r ([tex]\theta[/tex] is considered to be a constant) and solve that equation for [tex]\theta[/tex].

this should get you started

regards
marlon
 
If you can assume that the angle is tiny, you may approximate the sine with a finite sum, say [tex]\sin(\theta)\approx\theta-\frac{\theta^{3}}{6}[/tex]
This will yield:
[tex]\frac{\theta^{3}}{6}\approx\frac{2S}{r^{2}}\to\theta\approx(\frac{12S}{r^{2}})^{\frac{1}{3}}[/tex]
 
marlon said:
You can use derivatives. If you have been given a function f(x). this function has a local minimum/maximum at those x values where [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex]. To be sure you are looking at a local minimum, you need to make a sign chart of the first derivative you just calculated. At those x-points when the sign of the [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex] changes from - to + , you are in a minimum.

In your case you have a function S of both r and [tex]\theta[/tex]. The [tex]\theta[/tex] corresponding to the minimum segment can be found by taking the first derivative of S with respect to r ([tex]\theta[/tex] is considered to be a constant) and solve that equation for [tex]\theta[/tex].

this should get you started

regards
marlon

marlon, what does this problem have to do with finding a minimum?
 
HallsofIvy said:
marlon, what does this problem have to do with finding a minimum?
Well, isn't he supposed to find the angle corresponding to the minimum segment surface ?

marlon
 
No, he's trying to find what angle a segment intersects on a circle given the radius of the circle and the length of the segment
 
Office_Shredder said:
No, he's trying to find what angle a segment intersects on a circle given the radius of the circle and the length of the segment
Opps then i misread the question.

marlon
 
  • #10
Perhaps you misread " the minor segment ". Two radii divide a circle into two arcs. Unless the radii are part of the same diameter, one arc is smaller than the other: the "minor arc" and, by extension, forms the "minor segment".
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
Perhaps you misread " the minor segment ". Two radii divide a circle into two arcs. Unless the radii are part of the same diameter, one arc is smaller than the other: the "minor arc" and, by extension, forms the "minor segment".
KABOOMMMM... Indeed you are right : i completely misread that question. Thanks for the clarification.

regards
marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K