Rearranging formula using logarithms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around rearranging a formula involving logarithms in the context of a capacitor's current over time. The original poster is attempting to isolate the variable t in the equation i=6.7(1-e^(-t⁄RC)), where i represents the current in Amperes, R is the resistance, and C is the capacitance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's attempt to rearrange the formula and question why it seems incorrect when values are substituted. There are inquiries about the calculations leading to specific time values and the use of logarithmic functions.

Discussion Status

Several participants express agreement with the original poster's rearrangement, while others seek clarification on the calculations that yield unexpected results. A potential misunderstanding regarding the use of logarithmic functions is highlighted, suggesting a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions confusion stemming from the mathematical process and the expectation of specific outcomes based on the rearranged formula. There is also a reference to the homework requirement of using logarithms to solve for an unknown variable.

Mr_Mole
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I have a homework where I need to use logarithms to make an unknown the subject of a given formula. I know the answer I need (different values in the formula till one worked) but I can’t show how it’s done using logs.

If the flow of current (i), Amperes, in a capacitor at time (t), seconds, increases at an exponential according to the equation below:
i=6.7(1-e^(-t⁄RC) )
The resistance of the circuit is 28kΩ and the capacitance is 15µF.
Calculate the current after 750ms
Calculate the time for the current to reach 5A.
Relevant Equations
i=6.7(1-e^(-t⁄RC) )
My attempt that doesn’t work. t=-RC ln(1-I/6.7)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your "attempt that doesn't work" looks correct to me. To show why this is true via logarithms you'll need to use the idea that ln(e^x)=x for x>0. In other words, make e^x the subject of the equation and then take the natural log of both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and topsquark
It looks good to me also. Why do you think it's not correct?
 
What is the answer supposed to be?
 
DaveE said:
It looks good to me also. Why do you think it's not correct?
Because when I put values into it then I get the wrong answer. Using the information given in the question I get an answer of 5.576A for the first part. Putting that into the rearranged formula gives me a t value of 326milliseconds instead of 750milliseconds.
 
Mr_Mole said:
Because when I put values into it then I get the wrong answer. Using the information given in the question I get an answer of 5.576A for the first part. Putting that into the rearranged formula gives me a t value of 326milliseconds instead of 750milliseconds.
How are you getting 326ms?
 
DaveE said:
It looks good to me also. Why do you think it's not correct?
Mr_Mole said:
Homework Statement: I have a homework where I need to use logarithms to make an unknown the subject of a given formula. I know the answer I need (different values in the formula till one worked) but I can’t show how it’s done using logs.

If the flow of current (i), Amperes, in a capacitor at time (t), seconds, increases at an exponential according to the equation below:
i=6.7(1-e^(-t⁄RC) )
The resistance of the circuit is 28kΩ and the capacitance is 15µF.
Calculate the current after 750ms
Calculate the time for the current to reach 5A.
Relevant Equations: i=6.7(1-e^(-t⁄RC) )

My attempt that doesn’t work. t=-RC ln(1-I/6.7)
I’m not expecting the current to be 5A at 750ms. When rearranged to make t the subject, I would expect t to be 750ms when I input the current obtained when i is the subject. That was around 5.6A. I’m getting 325ms out which led me to believe it was incorrect. This aspect of maths baffles me hence how I ended up here relying on the kindness of helpful strangers with bigger brains than I.
 
Mr_Mole said:
I’m not expecting the current to be 5A at 750ms. When rearranged to make t the subject, I would expect t to be 750ms when I input the current obtained when i is the subject. That was around 5.6A. I’m getting 325ms out which led me to believe it was incorrect. This aspect of maths baffles me hence how I ended up here relying on the kindness of helpful strangers with bigger brains than I.
Can you explain how you are getting times of 325ms or 326ms?
 
Mr_Mole said:
I’m getting 325ms out
One of the more frequent mishaps: you used LOG on your calculator instead of LN

:smile:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, nasu, Mr_Mole and 1 other person
  • #10
YouAreAwesome said:
Can you explain how you are getting times of 325ms or 326ms?
I input the values into the rearranged equation. Using the same values given and the original answer I would expect to get the original i value returned to prove I had rearranged correctly. Unless I’m missing a step somewhere in the process and doing the rearranged equation incorrectly.
 
  • #11
BvU said:
One of the more frequent mishaps: you used LOG on your calculator instead of LN

:smile:

##\ ##
We have a winner! If only the maths tutor had explained that. No mention of an ln button. It comes out correct now. You are my hero! It was driving me mad last night as I couldn’t see the error. I will sleep well tonight!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and BvU
  • #12
Mr_Mole said:
I input the values into the rearranged equation. Using the same values given and the original answer I would expect to get the original i value returned to prove I had rearranged correctly. Unless I’m missing a step somewhere in the process and doing the rearranged equation incorrectly.
Thank you for helping. It’s been pointed out I didn’t know the existence of the ln button. I blame the tutor for not explain that one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K