Reason the early Universe was opaque?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The early universe was opaque due to the ionization of atoms, which prevented the formation of full atoms until approximately 400,000 years after the Big Bang. During this period, the universe was composed of a highly energetic plasma, where electrons were free and could scatter photons, unlike neutral atoms that do not react effectively to electric fields. The scattering of photons occurs primarily due to free electrons, as they can transition between energy states without the constraints faced by bound electrons in atoms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionization and plasma physics
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic (EM) radiation and its interaction with matter
  • Basic grasp of the chronology of the universe post-Big Bang
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the process of ionization in plasma physics
  • Study the quantum mechanical model of atoms and energy transitions
  • Explore the concept of photon scattering and its implications in astrophysics
  • Investigate the timeline of the universe's evolution from the Big Bang to the formation of atoms
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology interested in the early universe's properties and the fundamental interactions of matter and radiation.

PeterPeter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Apparently the early universe was opaque because the atoms were ionized.

I'm wondering, why do electrons scatter photons but atoms don't?

I'm presuming it's the electrons that do the scattering.
 
Space news on Phys.org
PeterPeter said:
Apparently the early universe was opaque because the atoms were ionized.

I'm wondering, why do electrons scatter photons but atoms don't?

I'm presuming it's the electrons that do the scattering.


Atomic nuclei formed at about 3 minutes after the singularity but entire atoms didn't form until about 400,000 thousand years after so until that time there were no full atoms to even BE ionized. This was all because the energy plasma that was the early universe was SO energetic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe#mediaviewer/File:History_of_the_Universe.svg
 
phinds said:
Atomic nuclei formed at about 3 minutes after the singularity but entire atoms didn't form until about 400,000 thousand years after so until that time there were no full atoms to even BE ionized. This was all because the energy plasma that was the early universe was SO energetic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe#mediaviewer/File:History_of_the_Universe.svg

But there must have been equal numbers of + and - charges (I'm assuming here) so there would have been ions and electrons - even if they had never met up with each other before.
 
PeterPeter said:
Apparently the early universe was opaque because the atoms were ionized.

I'm wondering, why do electrons scatter photons but atoms don't?

I'm presuming it's the electrons that do the scattering.

Atoms are electrically neutral overall and, thanks to their quantized energy levels, don't react very well to electric fields compared to free charges like you find in a plasma. In other words, an electric field cannot cause a whole atom to move since it's neutral, but it can cause an electron and a proton to move when they are unbound in a plasma. It's only when the frequency is just right that an electronic/nuclear transition can take place and the atom can absorb a photon.
 
The basis of the quantum mechanical model for atoms is that an isolated atom can only exist in certain energy (quantum) states. EM can be emitted or absorbed by transitions between these discrete states - i.e. only specific, characteristic wavelengths. When white light is shone through a gas, the gas will absorb only the wavelengths corresponding to its emission spectrum.
A free electron can have any energy state so it can transition from its present state to any other - absorbing any wavelength.
A bit of repetition there - sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K