Recalibration of a 80g Scale with a 50g Weight

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale Weight
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a user experiencing calibration issues with an 80g x 0.01g digital scale purchased from eBay, which reads 50.08g instead of the expected 50g when using a provided weight. The user is unsure about recalibrating the scale since the instructions are meant for a 200g model. They inquire if it is possible to recalibrate using the 50g weight without causing further issues. Participants suggest that the calibration procedure can still be followed with the 50g weight, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the scale is on a level surface for accurate readings. Concerns are raised about the weight's minor defect, which may not significantly affect the scale's accuracy. Recommendations include trying to obtain additional weights for verification and considering returning the scale to the seller for an exchange.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I bought a 80g x 0.01g scale from ebay and it came with a 50g weight. Now this weight is exactly 50g up to more than 1mg, I suppose? But when I put in on, it read 50.08g. So the scale is off it seems. There are instructions to recalibrate the scale but it seems like the instructions are talking as if I had a 200g scale. It says "To recalibrate, turn on the scale, wait til it read 0.00. Push UCAL. Put a 200g weight on. Wait 3 seconds. Press UCAL. Switch off."

In any case, I have a 80g scale and it came with a 50g weight. Can I still recalibrate the thing with the 50g weight or I'm going to screw it up even more? (I tried asking the compagny that made the scale but no response)

thx :cool:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What brand of scale do you have? What does the 50 g standard weight look like? Does it have a shiny silvery appearance or is it painted?
 
Hi chemisttree,

The weight is like this one: http://www.uptontea.com/shopcart/images/items/AR45-@DFL-200g+weight.gif

But there is a little defect on it... there is "50 g" carved on the top like in the picture, but the "g" is incomplete, so it resembles more a "q" than a "g". This probably means there is extra weight in the weight thatshould be there. Could that little missing branch in the "g" account for the 0.08±0.01g error?

The scale brand is Digital Scale E-S Series (it's a pocket scale). Design-wise it is exactly like this one: http://digitalscales.ca/MX50Gemscale.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Until you calibrate the instrument at full scale, you won't get an accurate result. You weighed a 50 g weight and read 50.08 g. You should follow the calibration procedure for the 250 g instrument and substitute the 50 g mass. Tare the instrument with no mass on the pan and read the indicator with the 50 g mass on the pan. It should read 50.00 g unless the linearity is screwed up. Linearity is listed for the model you linked to at +/- 0.01 g. To confirm this you will need some more masses. See here for the method.

http://www.iescorp.com/linearity.htm

You might want to confirm that the instrument is on a level surface as well. There is probably no way to adjust the level on this small instrument. You might try small slips of paper if the level is off.
 
If I was you and this happened. I would try to send it back and explain the situation to the seller. Hopefully you could at least exchange it for another one. I doubt that the missing part of the g is responsible for that much of an error but I bet that it could give you at least .01g-.02g maybe .03g but I doubt it would give you much more of an incorrect reading. Is there a hardware store near you with weights?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K