Drakkith said:
I don't believe the gene itself is recessive or dominant, but the traits that arise because of the genes are dominant or recessive. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessive_gene#Nomenclature
You are right. This is an important distinction when one allele controls two phenotypic features.
The expression of a particular phenotypic feature is dominant or recessive. However, one allele can control several different phenotypic features, each of which has a different ranking.
For example, consider the allele that usually determines sickle cell anemia.
The allele (i.e., chromosome locus) that controls sickle cell anemia has two genes. Gene A is associated with both sick cell anemia and malaria resistance. Gene B is associated with being free of sickle cell anemia and malaria predisposition.
Gene A is dominant with respect to malaria resistance but recessive with respect to sickle cell anemia. Gene B is recessive with respect to malaria predisposition but dominant with respect to freedom from sickle cell anemia.
If you do the arithmetic (Punnet squares), you find that this means the following. The heterozygous AB person with both genes A and B has no sickle cell anemia and is resistant to malaria. However, a homozygous AA is resistant to malaria but has sickle cell anemia. A homozygous BB person is not resistant to malaria but doesn't have sickle cell anemia.
In an area with lots of mosquitoes and the malaria parasite, natural selection favors a mixed population with both A and B genes.