Reciprocity applied to complementary antennas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antennas Applied
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the principle of reciprocity in antenna theory, specifically addressing the relationship between transmitting and receiving antennas. It confirms that if Antenna Y transmits power PY and Antenna Z receives it as power PZ, then the reverse holds true under specific conditions. The reciprocity principle, as derived from Stutzman & Theile, indicates that the voltage induced at one antenna's terminals when driven by a current will be replicated when the roles are reversed, provided the antennas are linear and isotropic. The conversation highlights the complexity of current patterns in antennas and the need for accurate references on this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antenna theory and reciprocity principles
  • Familiarity with Stutzman & Theile's work on antennas
  • Knowledge of linear and isotropic antenna behavior
  • Basic grasp of electrical specifications related to antennas
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Stutzman & Theile's "Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design" for in-depth understanding
  • Research the concept of linearity and isotropy in antenna design
  • Explore the Navy's antenna theory resources, particularly the provided slideshow
  • Investigate the differences in current patterns during transmission and reception in antennas
USEFUL FOR

Antenna engineers, electrical engineers, and students studying telecommunications who seek to deepen their understanding of antenna reciprocity and its implications in practical applications.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Does reciprocity, the rule that electrical specifications of an antenna are essentially the same for receiving and transmitting [Wikipedia], apply to the following situation:

Antenna Y transmits with power PY which antenna Z receives as power PZ. Does this mean if that antenna Z transmits with power PY, antenna Y receives it as power PZ? The antennae are assumed linear and well behaved.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm no antenna expert, but I believe that if the input Z of your two antennas are the same, then your statement will hold. The more general way that I've seen reciprocity derived (Stutzman & Theile, section 1.7) is in terms of the drive current into one antenna and the open circuit output voltage out of the other antenna:

Voc,a / Ib = Voc,b / Ia

If the two antennas have different input impedances at the drive frequency, then I think that your power statement may not hold. Like I said, though, I'm no expert on antennas...
 
berkeman,

Yours, the best explanation yet. One neat "power law" and more general than my original assertion, as you outline. Thank you.
 
Luckily, I'm an actual antenna expert.

Reciprocity is more interesting than that.

It says that if Antenna 1 is driven with a current i1 which
induces a voltage v2 at the terminals of antenna 2, then
if antenna 2 is driven with i1, antenna 1 will have v2 volts
at the terminals.

This rather remarkable statement holds regardless of z1 and z2
and regardless of the material configurations around or between
the antennas. Only linearity and isotropy is required.

What is amazing about this is that the transmitting and receiving
current patterns of any given antenna are not generally the same, and
reciprocity can be shown not to be a statement of energy
conservation.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Antiphon. This may be what I had seen originally, years ago. Do you have any Internet references for the relation?
 
Loren Booda said:
Thanks, Antiphon. This may be what I had seen originally, years ago. Do you have any Internet references for the relation?

Berkeman's Theile reference is a reliable textbook.

As far as the internet goes, I cannot find a single technically correct reference.
Most of them are flat out wrong and state that it means that an
transmitting antenna has the same characteristics as a receiving antenna, etc.
I will edit this post if I find one.

As I mentioned the current patterns are different on an antenna which is
transmitting than for the same antenna when receiving. Reciprocity would
not be so unusual if this were not the case.


Edit: The Navy has a decent link- start on page 42 of the slide show.
http://www.nps.navy.mil/Faculty/jenn/EO3602/Vol2v1.3.pdf

BTW, this is an oustanding executive summary slide show about antenna theory.
I can recommend it to anyone looking for a decent antenna theory reference
without having textbooks handy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent reference, Antiphon - I appreciate your homework.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K