Recognizing a product of two 3d rotations (matrices)

  • Thread starter AA1983
  • Start date
  • #1
5
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi, I have a problem identifying some 3d rotation matrices. Actually I don't know if the result can be brought on the desired form, however it would make sense from a physics point of view. My two questions are given at the bottom.

[tex]\mathbf{s}=\left(
\begin{array}{c}
s_{x} \\ s_{y} \\ s_{z}
\end{array} \right),\; \mathbf{S}=\left(
\begin{array}{c}
S_{x} \\ S_{y} \\ S_{z}
\end{array} \right)[/tex]

[tex]H=\left[\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
1-\left(1-C_{z}^{2}+C_{x}^{2}\right)\gamma^{2}& 0 & -2\gamma\left(1-C_{x}C_{z}\gamma\right) \\
0 & 1-\left(1+C_{z}^{2}+C_{x}^{2}\right)\gamma^{2} & 0 \\
2\gamma\left(1-C_{x}C_{z}\gamma\right)& 0 &
1-\left(1+C_{z}^{2}-C_{x}^{2}\right)\gamma^{2}
\end{array} \right) \mathbf{s}\right]\cdot\mathbf{S}
[/tex]

(this describes Kondo effect in a quantum dot with spin-orbit interaction)

The goal is to bring H on a the form [tex]H = \left(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{s}\right)\cdot\left(\mathbf{B}\mathbf{S}\right)[/tex] where A and B are matrices describing rotations.


For Cx=Cz=0 :


[tex]H=\left[\left(1-\gamma^{2}\right)\underbrace{\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 0 & \theta \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
-\theta & 0 & 1
\end{array} \right)}_{R_{y}(\theta)+O(\theta^{2})}
\mathbf{s}\right]\cdot\mathbf{S} \;\; \approx \;\; \left(1-\gamma^{2}\right)\left(R_{y}(\theta) \mathbf{s}
\right)\cdot \mathbf{S} \;, \qquad \theta=\frac{-2\gamma}{1-\gamma^{2}}
[/tex]

That is, H is a vector product between spin S and a spin s that has been rotated around the y-axis with angle theta.

For Cx and Cz different from 0 :

In this case the matrix cannot be direct identified as a rotation around the x,y or z axis. The questions are now:

1) can it be a rotation around another axis?
2) Is it possible to write it as [tex]H = \left(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{s}\right)\cdot\left(\mathbf{B}\mathbf{S}\right)[/tex] where A and B are matrices describing rotations?

I would be glad if anybody has an idea about how to deal with this.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
410
0
You essentially have written that [tex]H = \mathbf{s}_1^T \mathbf{D} \mathbf{s}_2[/tex], and the question is whether you can write [tex]\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{A} \mathbf{B}[/tex], where A and B are rotation matrices. Now, rotation matrices form a group, hence [tex]\mathbf{D}[/tex] should also be a rotation matrix. Is [tex]\mathbf{D}[/tex] orthogonal? I'm assuming it is.

Anyway, there isn't a unique way of writing D as a product of two rotations. One is to take A = D and B = identity. Maybe I've misunderstood.
 
  • #3
One of the real eigenvectors of the matrix is the y unit vector, so if it is a rotation matrix it can only possibly be a rotation about the y-axis. If it is a rotation matrix, the corresponding eigenvalue
[tex] 1-\left(1+C_{z}^{2}+C_{x}^{2}\right)\gamma^{2}[/tex],
must be equal to 1. This can only happen if \gamma = 0. So except in this presumably trivial case, no, it is not a rotation matrix.

Dave
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Recognizing a product of two 3d rotations (matrices)

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
619
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
415
Top