Recommend textbook for complex analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on recommendations for accessible and well-regarded textbooks on complex analysis for graduate education. Key suggestions include "An Invitation to Complex Analysis" by Ralph Boas, "Visual Complex Analysis" by Tristan Needham, and "Complex Variables: Introduction and Applications" by Ablowitz and Fokas, noted for their accessibility and breadth of topics. Other mentioned texts include "Complex Analysis" by Lars Ahlfors, which is considered a canonical graduate text, and "Complex Analysis" by Gamelin, which is described as encyclopedic but somewhat sloppy in proofs. The discussion highlights the importance of finding texts that balance mathematical rigor with readability and practical exercises.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and functions
  • Understanding of basic calculus and analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and theorems
  • Experience with graduate-level mathematics coursework
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Visual Complex Analysis" by Tristan Needham for its intuitive approach
  • Explore "Complex Variables: Introduction and Applications" by Ablowitz and Fokas for a comprehensive overview
  • Investigate "Complex Analysis" by Lars Ahlfors for its canonical status in graduate studies
  • Look into Serge Lang's book and its solutions manual by Shakarchi for additional exercises
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in mathematics, educators seeking comprehensive teaching resources, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of complex analysis through well-regarded textbooks.

micomaco86572
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Could someone recommend an accessible and well-known textbook of complex analysis for graduate education? thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've always liked "An Invitation to Complex Analysis" by Ralph Boas.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I've always liked "An Invitation to Complex Analysis" by Ralph Boas.

Thx! :smile:
 
Does someone know something about Complex Variables: Introduction and Applications by Ablowitz? This book is highly rated in Amazon.
Is it accessible? Is it too mathematical?
 
Last edited:
Another book that comes very highly recommended on Amazon is "Visual Complex Analysis" by Needham: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0198534469/?tag=pfamazon01-20

But my favorite complex analysis text - the one I've found most informative, accessible, and readable - is the one by Stein and Shakarchi: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691113858/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In my graduate course, we used Gamelin's book, which is ENCYCLOPEDIC in scope. But some of his proofs seem to be a little sloppy and take a lot for granted: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387950699/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The canonical graduate text - for YEARS - has been Ahlfors: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0070006571/?tag=pfamazon01-20. But for some reason, it costs $200!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
micomaco86572 said:
Does someone know something about Complex Variables: Introduction and Applications by Ablowitz? This book is highly rated in Amazon.
Is it accessible? Is it too mathematical?
The book by Ablowitz and Fokas is very accessible and reaches a wide range of topics. :)
 
Ahlfors is a graduate text? I don't know about that really, it serves me fine as an undergraduate text, very well written, I would recommend it.

I have heard people raving like crackpots about how amazing Needham's book is, so I would recommend that also, been meaning to get my hands on that now for a while.

If I may be so bold to ask, can anyone recommend one with lots of exercises. :smile:
 
thank you all, U did me a big favor!
 
  • #10
Bruce Palka also wrote a nice book, in the UTM series: click.
 
  • #11
The classic of alfhors is excellent but terse.
the conway book is boring. It introduces analytic functions as continuously differentiable functions and messes up simple integration . it has messed up a simple problem of integrating multivalued function by avoiding the use of branches.a very wrong text.
lang's is good . emphasis on poewer series is good but formal ower series is unnecessary.
pristley is good but treatment of cauchy's theorem is not satisfactory. it is good at conway but not initial version . churchill is good but gain general treatment of cauchy's theorem is not there.
lanfg and alfhors both use interhange of order of integration. rudin is too te5se and does not mention laurent's theorem! a great lacuna!
my notes partly on wikipedia partly on my website and partly with my students have avoided all drawbacks. we have complete homology vversion of cauchy theorem but do not need homotopy version formaly. also we have original treatment of elementary fnctions
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
897
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K