Recommendations for graduate text on electrodynamics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion regarding graduate texts on electrodynamics, participants evaluate the merits of "Classical Electrodynamics" by John David Jackson versus "The Classical Theory of Fields" by Landau and Lifshitz. It is established that Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" serves as a solid foundation for both undergraduate and graduate studies. While Jackson's text is recommended for its depth and clarity, it is noted that the problems presented are particularly challenging, which may deter some self-study learners.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics"
  • Familiarity with advanced calculus and differential equations
  • Basic knowledge of classical mechanics
  • Experience with problem-solving in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore problem sets from Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics"
  • Study Landau and Lifshitz's "The Classical Theory of Fields" for alternative perspectives
  • Review supplementary materials on advanced electrodynamics
  • Engage in discussion forums focused on electrodynamics problem-solving techniques
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, self-learners in electrodynamics, and educators seeking effective teaching resources in advanced electromagnetism.

captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
can anyone tell me whether jackson's or landau and lif****z's E&M book is better for self study (basically which is better for learning the theory and doing the problems also) assuming all prerequisite knowledge and material has been met (such as griffiths E&M text).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, learning Griffiths's E&M text really well would establish a really good foundation for most undergraduate- and graduate-level electrodynamics. For topics that aren't covered by Griffiths, I guess I would recommend Jackson (who writes better than most people give him credit for) but be warned--the problems in Jackson are notoriously impossible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K