Recursion relation for C-G coefficients

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and their properties as outlined in J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics." It raises questions about why terms in the recursion relation do not vanish when m1 + m2 equals m + 1 or m - 1, despite the coefficients being zero unless m equals m1 + m2. Additionally, it queries why, in a specific example, m1 + m2 equals m. The confusion stems from the application of the recursion relation and the conditions under which the coefficients are defined. Clarification on these points is sought to better understand the underlying quantum mechanics concepts.
Alien
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
From J.J. Zakurai page no.222-225:

We know that Clebsch-Gordan coefficients vanish unless m=m1+m2. Then,

(1) why is that the terms in recursion relation doesn't vanish? since m1+m2=m+1 or m1+m2=m-1 in eqn.(3.7.49).

(2) why is again in the example shown in eqn.(3.7.54), m1+m2=m?

I couldn't understand the whole thing. Somebody please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excuse me, the book is- "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J.J. Sakurai
 
what edition?
 
It is the 'revised edition' printed in 2005.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K