How Do You Calculate the Maximum Force on Stacked Blocks Without Slippage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speedking96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two stacked masses, M1 and M2, with a focus on calculating the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to M2 without causing M1 to slide off. The context includes static friction between the two masses and no friction between M2 and the surface below.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newton's laws and the role of friction in the system. Questions arise regarding whether to consider the total mass of the system or just the lower mass when calculating forces. Free body diagrams are suggested to clarify forces acting on each mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for drawing free body diagrams and writing net force equations. There is a recognition of the need to consider the forces acting on both masses, and some participants express confusion about handling multiple masses.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the forces involved, particularly the static friction between the two masses and the absence of friction with the surface. Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem setup and the implications of their assumptions.

Speedking96
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two masses M1 = 4.00 kg and M2 = 7.10 kg are stacked on top of each other as shown in the figure. The static coefficient of friction between M1 and M2 is μs = 0.430. There is no friction between M2 and the surface below it.

What is the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to M2 without M1 sliding relative to M2?


Homework Equations



F=ma

Ffriction = μFnormal

The Attempt at a Solution



For the 4 kg box:

Fnet = ma
Ff=ma
μmg = ma

μg=a
(0.43)(9.81) = a = 4.23 m/s/s

I understand that this must be the acceleration for the whole system, but when I calculate the max force, do I do it for the whole system's mass or for the 7.10 kg box only? Why or why not?
 

Attachments

  • IMG.png
    IMG.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 512
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram for the other box as well. Also, write the net force equations in the x and y directions.
 
physicsboy121 said:
Draw a free body diagram for the other box as well. Also, write the net force equations in the x and y directions.


For the y-direction:

∑forces = 0 ; since the object is not accelerating in that direction

For the x-direction:

Fnet= Fapp

Fapp=ma= (7.10)(4.23) = 16.88 Newtons

But, when we are applying the force to the lower box, aren't we essentially pushing the whole system? Therefore, shouldn't the mass of the whole system be considered?
 

Attachments

  • IMG2.png
    IMG2.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 500
You are missing one force on the FBD you just drew. And instead of F normal of the system, I suggest that you think it as F12 (i.e. force of mass 1 onto mass 2) Also the friction force on the FBD of your initial post should be pointing in the other direction.
 
physicsboy121 said:
You are missing one force on the FBD you just drew. And instead of F normal of the system, I suggest that you think it as F12 (i.e. force of mass 1 onto mass 2) Also the friction force on the FBD of your initial post should be pointing in the other direction.

Is it the static friction of the top box?
 
correct
 
physicsboy121 said:
correct


Fnet=ma
Fapp-Ff = ma

Fapp - μmg = ma

Fapp = ma + μmg

= (7.1)(4.23) + (0.43)(4)(9.81) = 46.91 Newtons ?
 
I don't know how to approach problems that deal with multiple masses. Frustrating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K