Recursive solution of determinants

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the determinant of a specific matrix defined by M_{ij} = A δ_{i,j} - B δ_{i,j-1} - C δ_{i,j+1} using a recursive method. The determinant D_N is expressed as D_N = A D_{N-1} - B C D_{N-2}, leading to solutions for λ as λ_{\pm} = (A ± √(A² - 4BC)) / 2. The final expression for D_N is derived as D_N = (λ_{+}^{N+1} - λ_{-}^{N+1}) / (λ_{+} - λ_{-}), utilizing initial conditions D_1 = A and D_2 = A² - BC. The discussion clarifies the method of solving recurrence relations and confirms the validity of the derived solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix determinants and their properties
  • Familiarity with recursive relations in mathematics
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of recurrence relations in linear algebra
  • Learn about the characteristic polynomial and its applications
  • Explore advanced matrix theory, focusing on determinants and eigenvalues
  • Investigate the application of determinants in solving linear differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and researchers working on matrix theory or determinants will benefit from this discussion.

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm reading a paper where the determinant of the following matrix is solved for using some kind of recurisve method.

The matrix is given by M_{ij} = A \delta_{i,j} - B \delta_{i,j-1} - C \delta_{i,j+1}, with i,j = 1...N and are NOT cyclic.

The author sets D_N = \texttt{det}\[M_{(N)}\] and writes the equation

D_N = A D_{N-1} - B C D_{N-2},

assumes a solution of the form D_N = \lambda ^N and finds two solutions,

\lambda_{\pm} = (A \pm \sqrt{A^2 - 4 B C}) / 2.


He then notes the initial conditions of D_1 = A and D_2 = A^2 - B C and says that the answer is therefore

D_N = \frac{\lambda_{+}^{N+1} - \lambda_{-}^{N+1}}{\lambda_{+} - \lambda_{-}}.


It's the very last step I don't understand, how did he find D_N?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After a bit of search I see that the method to solve this kind of recurrence relations is to assume a solution of the form A \lambda_1^N + B \lambda_2^N and find A and B from the initial conditions. However this is not exactly the form of the solution here... how come?
 
Why isn't it?
D_N= \frac{\lambda_+}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\lambda_+^n+ \frac{-1}{\lambda_-(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)}\lambda_-^n
is exactly of the form you give.
 
Yes that would be correct, a bad case of dullness. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K