Reducing EMC on CCA - Strategies and Suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter troberts24
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on strategies to reduce excessive radiated emissions in a PCB design, specifically addressing issues related to series termination resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Participants emphasize the importance of proper grounding techniques, including separating analog and digital ground planes, and suggest avoiding the use of inductors on power lines in favor of ferrite beads. The discussion highlights the need for detailed information about the design, including frequency specifics and layout considerations, to effectively diagnose and mitigate EMC issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PCB design principles, particularly in relation to EMC.
  • Familiarity with series termination resistors and their impact on signal integrity.
  • Knowledge of ferrite beads and inductors in power distribution networks.
  • Experience with grounding techniques, specifically separating analog and digital ground planes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "PCB grounding techniques" to optimize layout for EMC compliance.
  • Explore "ferrite bead applications" for effective noise reduction in power lines.
  • Study "high-frequency PCB design" to understand the impact of layout on emissions.
  • Investigate "EMC testing methods" to evaluate and diagnose radiated emissions effectively.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and designers involved in PCB development, especially those focused on EMC compliance and noise reduction strategies in electronic systems.

troberts24
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
We have a design which has some radiated emissions exceeding are stated levels.

We are trying to reduce our emissions profile.

1) We have increased our series termination resistors to "soften" the clock edges
2) I am looking at the various added inductors added to the power pours and planes.
I have not found much information indicating these are helping to reduce our emission levels.
I believe these inductors are making our emissions higher.
3) We have low value caps on the outputs of our oscillators, these are used in conjunction with
the series resistor as a low pass filter.

Any other suggestions or comments are welcom
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
troberts24 said:
We have a design which has some radiated emissions exceeding are stated levels.

We are trying to reduce our emissions profile.

1) We have increased our series termination resistors to "soften" the clock edges
2) I am looking at the various added inductors added to the power pours and planes.
I have not found much information indicating these are helping to reduce our emission levels.
I believe these inductors are making our emissions higher.
3) We have low value caps on the outputs of our oscillators, these are used in conjunction with
the series resistor as a low pass filter.

Any other suggestions or comments are welcom

Welcome to the PF.

We will need a lot more information to be of help. Can you say more and/or post pictures of your device? Have you read the standard EMC tutorial materials, including the classic book "Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic Systems" by Ott?
 
Is this on a breadboard or a PCB? Or is it a chip?

If on a PCB you should separate the analog and digital ground planes.

For specific types of systems you can find lots of discussion and advice. For example this is for PCBs:
http://www.cypress.com/?docID=28761
 
yes this is a PCB which has been built...Yes we have a ferrite bead on the digital and analog ground plane.
I just do not believe adding ferrite beads on Digital power pours is helping us...
 
troberts24 said:
yes this is a PCB which has been built...Yes we have a ferrite bead on the digital and analog ground plane.
I just do not believe adding ferrite beads on Digital power pours is helping us...

Please post much more information about your device. You are wasting our time with such general questions (sorry to be harsh).
 
I do not intend to be overly vague... It should actually be a simple answer...I could take a snapshot of the schematic to show the inductors in series with the power pours... I have not located anything on the web to indicate the inductors reduce the high frequency noise.. I believe they are making the problem worse. I was always taught, the power pours should have very low impedance...
 
troberts24 said:
I do not intend to be overly vague... It should actually be a simple answer...I could take a snapshot of the schematic to show the inductors in series with the power pours... I have not located anything on the web to indicate the inductors reduce the high frequency noise.. I believe they are making the problem worse. I was always taught, the power pours should have very low impedance...

Excessive radiated emissions comes from common-mode RF currents that excite resonant antenna-like conducting structures in and around your product. It can be anything from poor "star grounding" to parasitic capacitive coupling of signals into parts of your metal enclosure or external metal.

Sometimes ferrite beads help, and sometimes they don't. It all depends on the PCB layout, the circuitry involved, the frequencies involved, and what the final radiating structure is. Your question is still to vague for me. I will unsubscribe from this thread, and hopefully others will be willing to help you. I'm an EMC expert, BTW.
 
How many layers? What frequencies? How are you detecting the EMC? Is this a school project or something else?

You seem to think that adding inductors everywhere is the solution. This is only part of the solution, and may not be the solution for your situation.

That is why I posted the particular reference in #3; there is an immense literature on this topic, magazines devoted to it. As with most problems you must examine the system as a whole, and work through all of the details. Here is a tutorial: http://www.learnemc.com/EMC-Tutorials.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, let me add further details..
We have 24MHz and 27MHz crystals in the design, they both have 33 ohm series resistors at the output.
The crystals are as close to the IC as possible. Our product is audio and video based... We have RE violations
up to the 7th harmonic of these base frequencies.. Our design uses a 6 layer board.. Our digital signals are coupled to an adjacent plane with ground copper plane and power plane... I am suggesting various things to reduce the emissions short of a new PWB design.. One possible reduction is to remove there small inductors added to the LDO and switcher outputs... I do not believe they are needed...

Tom
 
  • #10
Don't use inductors on the power lines. Use ferrite beads. As for inductors making things worse, it is hard to say. An inductor feeding a large enough capacitor (with small caps also) will keep high frequency currents out of the supply. The low impedance comes from the bypass capacitors.

Are there cables involved besides the power cables, and what happens to emissions when they are disconnected?

Are your violations at all related to the switcher? Does it have adequate snubbing?

What sort of case is this in?

How are the power grids layed out and bypassed (ground is more important)? Are there local 0.1uF bypasses at all IC's?

Are the clock layed out as transmission lines? Always over a ground plane?

Are there sufficient grounds in any cables?
 
  • #11
UltrafastPED said:
If on a PCB you should separate the analog and digital ground planes.

troberts24 said:
yes this is a PCB which has been built...Yes we have a ferrite bead on the digital and analog ground plane.
I just do not believe adding ferrite beads on Digital power pours is helping us...

Berkeman is correct, this type of issue cannot be productively discussed without a certain minimum critical mass of information.

If you indeed have separate analog and digital ground planes this would be what I would suspect first. If you have a way of bonding them together try that first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
15K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
10K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K