I References for Hamiltonian field theory and Dirac Brackets

AI Thread Summary
Complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets are sought, particularly in the context of electrodynamics. The discussion highlights a dissatisfaction with existing quantum field theory texts, such as Weinberg, which provide only brief coverage of these topics. Recommended foundational texts include "Quantization of Gauge Theories" by Henneaux and Teitelboim, and "Constrained Dynamics" by Sundermayer. These works are considered essential for a comprehensive understanding of the theory. Engaging with these references will provide a thorough exposition from the ground up.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
I'm looking for complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets. While my main interest is electrodynamics, I would prefer a complete exposition of the theory from the ground up.

So far, my knowledge about the topic comes from books in QFT, like Weinberg. But those books just want to get over with it quickly and go to QED, so it is somewhat unsatisfactory.

So, any good reference out there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely, it is the "bible" Henneaux, M., Teitelboim, C. "Quantization of Gauge Theories", or Sundermayer, K. "Constrained Dynamics".
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Solving this non-holonomic system using Dirac-Bergmann theory
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Classical Field Theory - Something isn't clicking
Replies
12
Views
1K
I What is the relationship between the Hamiltonian and Lorentz invariance?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Hamiltonian formulation of *classical* field theory
Replies
7
Views
6K
Primary constraints for Hamiltonian field theories
Replies
8
Views
2K
I How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
A Confusion about creation/annihilation operators with interaction
Replies
1
Views
105
I String theory vs Quantum field theory
Replies
1
Views
3K
Understanding Hamiltonian Field Equations and Their Applications in Field Theory
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Understanding the Mistake in Dirac's Hamiltonian for Field Quantization
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top