I References for Hamiltonian field theory and Dirac Brackets

AI Thread Summary
Complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets are sought, particularly in the context of electrodynamics. The discussion highlights a dissatisfaction with existing quantum field theory texts, such as Weinberg, which provide only brief coverage of these topics. Recommended foundational texts include "Quantization of Gauge Theories" by Henneaux and Teitelboim, and "Constrained Dynamics" by Sundermayer. These works are considered essential for a comprehensive understanding of the theory. Engaging with these references will provide a thorough exposition from the ground up.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
I'm looking for complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets. While my main interest is electrodynamics, I would prefer a complete exposition of the theory from the ground up.

So far, my knowledge about the topic comes from books in QFT, like Weinberg. But those books just want to get over with it quickly and go to QED, so it is somewhat unsatisfactory.

So, any good reference out there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely, it is the "bible" Henneaux, M., Teitelboim, C. "Quantization of Gauge Theories", or Sundermayer, K. "Constrained Dynamics".
 

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Simple thought experiment with Stefan-Boltzmann law: energy'

Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Solving this non-holonomic system using Dirac-Bergmann theory
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Classical Field Theory - Something isn't clicking
Replies
12
Views
2K
I What is the relationship between the Hamiltonian and Lorentz invariance?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Hamiltonian formulation of *classical* field theory
Replies
7
Views
6K
Primary constraints for Hamiltonian field theories
Replies
8
Views
3K
I How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
A Confusion about creation/annihilation operators with interaction
Replies
1
Views
237
I String theory vs Quantum field theory
Replies
1
Views
3K
Understanding Hamiltonian Field Equations and Their Applications in Field Theory
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Understanding the Mistake in Dirac's Hamiltonian for Field Quantization
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top