I References for Hamiltonian field theory and Dirac Brackets

Click For Summary
Complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets are sought, particularly in the context of electrodynamics. The discussion highlights a dissatisfaction with existing quantum field theory texts, such as Weinberg, which provide only brief coverage of these topics. Recommended foundational texts include "Quantization of Gauge Theories" by Henneaux and Teitelboim, and "Constrained Dynamics" by Sundermayer. These works are considered essential for a comprehensive understanding of the theory. Engaging with these references will provide a thorough exposition from the ground up.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
I'm looking for complete and detailed references on constrained Hamiltonian systems and Dirac brackets. While my main interest is electrodynamics, I would prefer a complete exposition of the theory from the ground up.

So far, my knowledge about the topic comes from books in QFT, like Weinberg. But those books just want to get over with it quickly and go to QED, so it is somewhat unsatisfactory.

So, any good reference out there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely, it is the "bible" Henneaux, M., Teitelboim, C. "Quantization of Gauge Theories", or Sundermayer, K. "Constrained Dynamics".
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'

Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'

Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Solving this non-holonomic system using Dirac-Bergmann theory
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Classical Field Theory - Something isn't clicking
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
I What is the relationship between the Hamiltonian and Lorentz invariance?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Hamiltonian formulation of *classical* field theory
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Primary constraints for Hamiltonian field theories
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
I How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
A Confusion about creation/annihilation operators with interaction
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
468
I String theory vs Quantum field theory
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Understanding Hamiltonian Field Equations and Their Applications in Field Theory
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Understanding the Mistake in Dirac's Hamiltonian for Field Quantization
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K