Reflection coefficient at a copper boundary

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the reflection coefficient of copper for radio waves at 50 GHz and yellow light at a wavelength of 0.6 micrometers. Key equations include the reflection coefficient formula and the refractive index calculation, which involves frequency and wavelength. The challenge lies in linking the refractive index to the frequency and wavelength, as both are unknowns in the equations. It is noted that since copper is a conductor, the problem requires different equations involving conductivity (sigma), and for both frequencies, the absorption is negligible, leading to a reflection coefficient of R=1. The complexity of the calculations is emphasized due to the nature of copper as a conductive material.
Supra
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the reflection coefficient of copper for radio waves at frequency 50Ghz and yellow light (wavelength = 0.6 micrometers)


Homework Equations



Reflection coefficient: R = E(r)^2/E(I)^2 = (1-n/1+n)^2
Where E(r) is the electric intensity of the reflected wave, E(I) is the intensity of the incident wave

Also, refractive index, n, is given by n = c/v, where v is given by frequency x wavelength.

n = (epsilon x mu)^1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



The key variable appears to be the frequency (wavelength for the yellow light) which effects the refractive index of the copper material. My problem is linking the two together, because as stated in the above equations, I am aware of the relationship but can't pin down a definite relationship which allows me to calculate one from the other.

Any attempt to re-arrange n = c/v fails as even if i break v down in frequency x wavelength, i still have 2 unknowns (refractive index and wavelength (for radio waves) and frequency (for yellow light).)

Any help with this would be much appreciated, as once the refractive index is found then the first equation stated can be used.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Copper is a conductor so the problem is much more complicated.
You have to use sigma, the conductivity of copper, and use completely different equations.
 
For both of your frequencies, the absorption is negligible, so R=1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K