Refractive Index - Lens question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a double concave lens with specified radii of curvature and object/image distances, seeking to determine the index of refraction of the lens material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the lens formula and the sign conventions used in calculations. There are attempts to calculate the focal length and index of refraction, with some questioning the validity of their results and the equations used.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and results, with one suggesting a possible answer of n=1.98. Others have raised concerns about the sign convention and its impact on the calculations, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of different sign conventions and their implications for the calculations, as well as uncertainty regarding the applicability of certain equations to concave lenses.

jacksonwiley
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A double concave lens has equal radii of curvature of 15.1 cm. An object placed 14.2 cm from the lens forms a virtual image 5.0 cm from the lens. What is the index of refraction of the lens material?

A. 1.98
B. 1.9
C. 1.84
D. 2.06

Homework Equations



1/f = (n – 1 ) (1/R1 - 1/R2 )
1/f = 1/do + 1/di

The Attempt at a Solution



1/f = 1/14.2 + 1/5.0 so i get 1/f = 0.27

1/f = (n – 1 ) (1/R1 - 1/R2 )
0.27 = (n-1) (1/15.1 - (-1/15.1)

this results in an n equal to about 3.03 which is not close to any of the answers, though I'm sure i have the right equations, I'm just not sure what I'm doing wrong?
are these only applicable to convex lens?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am getting n=1.98 .Is this the correct answer ?
 
Vibhor said:
I am getting n=1.98 .Is this the correct answer ?

i'm not sure if that is right but it is an answer choice. what method did you use?
 
The problem is with the calculation of focal length . You should be very careful with whatever sign convention you are using . 1/f is coming out to be -0.13 cm . I am using new coordinate sign convention where the direction of incident rays is considered positive .In this sign convention both the object as well as image distance is negative.
 
If the image is virtual than di is negative (according with the most common sign convention which seems to be the one used here).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K