Refractive Index vs Conductivity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of refractive index and conductivity as methods for determining the concentration of solutions, particularly in industrial applications. Participants explore various factors influencing the accuracy of these methods, including the type of solution and specific use cases.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the accuracy of refractive index versus conductivity depends on the type of solution, such as whether it is an electrolyte or non-electrolyte.
  • Questions are raised about the conductivity of specific substances, like sucrose in water, indicating a need for clarification on its relevance to the discussion.
  • One participant proposes that for industrial chemicals, density or specific gravity might be more useful than refractive index or conductivity due to the complexity of compositions.
  • Another participant mentions that optical transmittance and dissolved solids measurements could also be relevant, although they note that dissolved solids measurements may require evaporation of the sample.
  • A participant shares insights from their experience with industrial processes, highlighting challenges in measuring circulating solids and the limitations of various sensor technologies.
  • There is a suggestion to consider dielectric constant measurements as a potential method for assessing opaque solutions, linking it to refractive index.
  • One participant recommends using conductivity for ionic alkaline detergents, noting that the detergents may affect conductivity during the washing process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the most suitable method for measuring concentration, with no clear consensus on which method is superior. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for specific applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence measurement accuracy, such as solution composition, the presence of ionic species, and the need for calibration in industrial settings. Limitations in existing methods and the potential for new technologies are also discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to professionals and researchers working in industrial chemistry, chemical engineering, and related fields, particularly those involved in solution concentration measurement and sensor technology development.

kunalvanjare
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Hello all,

I would like to know which of the above two methods used in determining concentration of a solution is more accurate?

Thanks,
KV
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depends on the solution: electrolyte, non-electrolyte, ...
 
Bystander said:
Depends on the solution: electrolyte, non-electrolyte, ...
Thanks for the reply. Could you elaborate please.
 
What is the conductivity of sucrose in water?
 
Bystander said:
What is the conductivity of sucrose in water?
OK I get your point. Although my application does not revolve around sugar solutions. It's mostly industrial usage chemicals for eg. Machining coolants or Alkaline detergents used for washing parts.
 
Might be handier to look at density/specific gravity for that (see the sugar tables in CRC's Hndbk of Chem. & Phys.); there're too many composition variables to handle with "tailored" assays.
 
Optical transmittance (clarity) is also often used, as is DIssolved Solids. Dissolved solids measurements, however, may require evaporation of a water sample. Considering the range of stuff you want to detect, you will probably need a combination of tests.
 
Reminds me of some work done by my employers to try to bypass a tedious daily 'evaporation' test for circulating solids etc in inhaler filling lines...

Summarising several decades of oft-ingenious attempts, gallant failures and incremental improvements, really simple sensors could give a semi-quantitative approach, each product and each flow-rate requiring patient generation of an ad-hoc calibration graph. Trying to get beyond that was bollixed by managers' attempts to run lines beyond their 'sweet spot' speeds, random stops & starts producing erratic line data, plus a lot more lab-work due to the surfeit of 'micro-batches'...

The alternative of a flow-through density instrument cost far more than its data was worth...

IIRC, the sugar and sugar product industry refined 'refractive index' sensor design. The 'cleaning products' people cleaned up with conductivity, dielectric properties, Redox, pH, opalescence etc etc...

May I suggest you trawl old-ish reference library sources for ideas ? You may be able to miniaturise, stabilise and harden old tech using eg LEDs, lasers etc...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
kunalvanjare said:
It's mostly industrial usage chemicals for eg. Machining coolants or Alkaline detergents used for washing parts.
With cutting fluids, such as soluble oil in water, the density will be reduced by the oil. A sensitive float switch can be adjusted to trip on low or high density. I use a solid polymer ball that floats in water, but sinks in oil, to detect water in an oil tank. Likewise, diesel fuel systems sometimes employ a water sedimenter with a similar density float and magnet, with a reed switch to the sedimenter warning light.

Dielectric constant Er, is related to refractive index. Water and oil have very different Er. You can measure Er of opaque solutions by measuring electrical capacitance between two plates immersed in the solution. Build an RC oscillator and monitor the frequency changes with changing concentration of soluble oil. It might meet your requirements and do the job.

I would try conductivity for ionic alkaline detergents used for washing parts. The detergents may change conductivity as they react during the washing process. That may help or hinder the measurement. Use low voltage AC conductance measurements to avoid electrolysis of electrodes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
429
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
917
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
396
Replies
12
Views
2K