Regarding double well potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a double-well potential and the derivation of eigenvalue conditions for a particle in this potential. The original poster presents a specific form of the potential and seeks to establish the conditions for even and odd solutions of the wave function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define the wave function across different regions of the potential and expresses concerns about continuity conditions leading to a set of equations. Some participants question the appropriateness of the wave function forms chosen for odd solutions and suggest alternatives.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on the selection of wave functions and discussing the implications of continuity conditions. There is an exploration of different approaches to defining the wave function, with some suggestions made regarding the separation of odd and even functions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the wave functions adhere to the conditions of odd and even solutions, with participants noting the potential mix of function types in the original poster's approach. The expected forms of the wave functions are also under discussion, with some uncertainty about the necessity of specific expressions.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
A particle is in the following double-well potential with E<0:
V(x)=0 for x<-a, x>a; -V0 for -a<x<-b, b<x<a; 0 for -b<x<b
I am asked to show that the eigenvalues conditions may be written in the form:
tan(q(a-b))=qα(1+tanh(αb)/(q22tanh(αb))$$
and
tan(q(a-b))=qα(1+coth(αb)/(q22coth(αb))$$
for the even and odd solutions, where -E=ħ2α2/2m and E+V02q2/2m.

I first tried to define the wave function in the various regions, focusing on the positive x-axis only and demanding odd solutions:
Ψ(x)=Ae-αx for x>a; Bsin(q(x-b)) for b<x<a; Ce-αx + Deαx for 0<x<b

Is that correct thus far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good so far.
 
Alright, but as I impose continuity of wave function and its derivatives I obtain the four following equations, from which I am unable to derive the desired expression:
(1) Ae-αa = Bsin(q(a-b))
(2) -αAe-αa = Bqcos(q(a-b))
(3) 0 = Ce-αb + Deαb
(4) Bq = -αCe-αb + Dαeαb

What am I doing wrong?
 
You could explain what you did. Where does equation 3 come from?
Where is the odd/even condition?
 
Well, equation 3 stems from the demand for continuity at x=b. I have decided to focus on the odd solutions first, hence the use of sine. Is that wrong?
 
Ah, I see the issue.
The way you defined the wave function in the well, you get a mixture of odd and even functions (the sine would have some non-zero value at x=0). If you want odd functions, you need something like sin(qx).
 
So which function ought I to choose for Ψ(x) in the well? Ought it to be a combination of sine and cosine at once (like harmonic oscillator)?
 
In other words, should I then simply choose sin(qx) for the odd and cos(qx) for the even, within the well?
 
peripatein said:
So which function ought I to choose for Ψ(x) in the well? Ought it to be a combination of sine and cosine at once (like harmonic oscillator)?
You can do that, if you choose them without that offset it is easier to split them into odd and even contributions.
peripatein said:
In other words, should I then simply choose sin(qx) for the odd and cos(qx) for the even, within the well?
That is the easierst approach I think.
 
  • #10
Yet please note the expressions I am expected to arrive at. It seems I am indeed expected to use forms as sin(q(x-b)). Wouldn't you agree?
 
  • #11
I don't see how you get that impression. Yes there is an q(a-b), but that can appear in other ways, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K