Particle in a well, can someone explain how this step works

In summary, we are trying to determine the energy for bounded states of a particle with mass m, under potential V(x) = ∞ when x<0, -V0 when 0<x<a, 0 when x>a. For part A, the relation for energy is given by tan(√(2ma^2(E+V0)/h^2)=-√(E+V0/-E). For part B, we need to find the values of V0 for which the particle has only one bounded state. This is achieved by choosing the cotangent function so that it only has one period in the corresponding interval -V0<E<0. This leads to the inequality pi^2*h^2/
  • #1
Homework Statement
A particle with mass m is effected by potential V(x) = ∞ when x<0, -V0 when 0<x<a, 0 when x>a
A) Set up a relation from which the energy for bounded states can de determined
B) For which values V0 does the particle have only one bounded state?
Relevant Equations
tan(√(2ma^2(E+V0)/h^2)=-√(E+V0/-E)
Homework Statement:: A particle with mass m is effected by potential V(x) = ∞ when x<0, -V0 when 0<x<a, 0 when x>a
A) Set up a relation from which the energy for bounded states can de determined
B) For which values V0 does the particle have only one bounded state?
Homework Equations:: tan(√(2ma^2(E+V0)/h^2)=-√(E+V0/-E)

Hi! I understand the most of this example problem, I have no problem with A), which the answer is the relation tan(√(2ma^2(E+V0)/h^2)=-√(E+V0/-E), and I mostly understand B), it is just one part in the end I can't follow. Choosing the tangens function so that it only has one period in the corresponding intervall -V0<E<0 and the equations only have one point that they meet in. Therefor we put that pi/2 < √(2ma^2(E+V0)/h^2) <3pi/2 since pi/2 to 3pi/2 is a period for a tangens function, but from there they say that the equation gives pi^2*h^2/8ma^2 < V0 < 9pi^2*h^2/8ma^2, but I don't follow this step. What happened to E, why are you allowed to take it away? Shouldn't it be pi^2*h^2/8ma^2 < V0 + E < 9pi^2*h^2/8ma^2 (instead of just V0)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you sure it is ##\tan## function only? Please check your solution. For that you don't need the restriction π/2 to 3π/2. The curve will always intersect the graph between 0 to π/2. See the graph below.
IMG_20191206_132606_715.JPG
.

If you meant ##\cot## then the restriction applies. In that case simply note that since by defination of bound state ##-V_0 \leq E \leq 0##, ##E+V_0## is positive only if E=0 for then only inequalty is valid. See below.
IMG_20191206_132622_085.JPG


In both the graphs I have changed variables for my convenience.
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Particle in a well, can someone explain how this step works

Replies
2
Views
454
Replies
61
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
711
Replies
14
Views
919
Replies
7
Views
495
Replies
7
Views
551
Replies
1
Views
603
Replies
3
Views
222
Back
Top