Rehabilitating Lungs: Options for Those Without Transplants

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SW VandeCarr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around potential options for rehabilitating lungs for individuals who are unable to receive transplants. It touches on the challenges and limitations of current treatments, particularly in the context of chronic conditions like sarcoidosis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express optimism about the future of lung rehabilitation, suggesting that it may be a viable alternative to transplants.
  • One participant appreciates the cautious perspective of the authors, noting the complexities involved in gene and stem cell therapies, and speculates that lung rehabilitation might be developed before these therapies.
  • A participant shares insights about lung transplants in the context of chronic sarcoidosis, indicating that the condition often recurs within two years post-transplant, suggesting that existing treatments may only provide temporary relief.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the side effects and complications associated with anti-rejection medications following lung transplants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and effectiveness of lung rehabilitation versus transplantation, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of current treatments for chronic lung conditions and the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effectiveness of lung transplants, particularly in relation to sarcoidosis.

SW VandeCarr
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
77
Lungs gone bad? Can't get a transplant? Maybe you can get old lungs rehabed in the future.

http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/25657/?a=f
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
I like the conservative view of the authors, not saying this is just around the corner, and the notion is very appealing. Given challenges in gene and stem cell therapies, I wouldn't be shocked if this comes first.
 
Thanks SW,

I passed this on to a long time friend, who has chronic sarcoidosis. We discuss issues related to health all the time. The problem is as best I understand it, that to date, anyone who receives a lung transplant (as last resort to save someone's life), within 2 years the sarcoid returns in most every case, so at best the "old treatment" gives the person more time. As one would imagine there are plenty of side effects and anti-rejection med issues to deal with too.

Rhody... :smile:
 
rhody said:
Thanks SW,

I passed this on to a long time friend, who has chronic sarcoidosis. We discuss issues related to health all the time. The problem is as best I understand it, that to date, anyone who receives a lung transplant (as last resort to save someone's life), within 2 years the sarcoid returns in most every case, so at best the "old treatment" gives the person more time. As one would imagine there are plenty of side effects and anti-rejection med issues to deal with too.

Rhody... :smile:

This is sadly true, but time is precious and pain is fleeting.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
24K