Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Reichenbach synchronisation method and its implications for proving that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection (##i = r##). Participants explore the one-way speed of light in different directions and the transformation between Minkowski and Anderson coordinates, examining how these concepts relate to the proposed proof.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant states that using Reichenbach synchronisation, the one-way speed of light in the x and y-direction is ##\frac{c}{2\epsilon}## and in the reverse direction is ##\frac{c}{2(1-\epsilon)}##, leading to an average round trip speed of light of ##c##.
- The same participant expresses a goal to prove that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, noting that using Huyghens leads to different results.
- Another participant introduces their use of units where ##c=1## and Anderson coordinates, providing a transformation between Minkowski and Anderson coordinates and discussing the equations for ingoing and outgoing null geodesics.
- This participant claims that the transformation does not affect spatial coordinates, only the temporal coordinate, suggesting that the angle remains the same in both cases.
- Several participants inquire about "Anderson coordinates," indicating a need for additional resources or clarification on the topic.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
There is no consensus on the proof of ##i = r##, as participants present different approaches and raise questions about the underlying concepts. The discussion includes competing views on the implications of the transformations and the use of different coordinate systems.
Contextual Notes
Participants have not fully resolved the implications of their respective approaches, and there are missing assumptions regarding the definitions and applications of the coordinate systems discussed.