Undergrad Reichenbach Synchronisation: Proving i=r

Click For Summary
Reichenbach synchronization is utilized to demonstrate that the average round trip speed of light remains constant at c, regardless of the chosen value of epsilon. The goal is to prove that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection (i = r), but using Huyghens leads to differing results. The transformation between Minkowski and Anderson coordinates shows that while temporal coordinates are affected, spatial coordinates remain unchanged, supporting the conclusion that angles remain consistent. A link to further information on Anderson coordinates is provided. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between light speed, coordinate transformations, and angle consistency in physics.
wnvl2
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
I use Reichenbach synchronisation. The one-way speed of light (OWSOL) in the x and y-direction is ##\frac{c}{2\epsilon}## and in the reverse direction it is for both ##\frac{c}{2(1-\epsilon)}## such that the average round trip speed of light is ##c##. For any choice of ##\epsilon## the physical laws should remain the sames as for ##\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}##.

My goal is to prove that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. When using Huyghens it is obvous that I get a different result.

How can I prove ##i = r##?
mirror.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I use units where ##c=1## and Anderson coordinates so ##\kappa=2 \epsilon-1##. The transform between Minkowski coordinates (lower case) and Anderson coordinates (upper case) is: $$ t=T+\kappa X$$ $$x=X$$ $$y=Y$$ $$z=Z$$

So, in the Minkowski coordinates we can write the equation of an ingoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##\lambda<0## and the equation of an outgoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##0<\lambda##.

Then transforming from the Minkowski coordinates to the Anderson coordinates we get $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda + \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ and $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda - \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$

So the transformation does not affect the spatial coordinates, just the temporal coordinate. So the angle is the same in both cases.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and wnvl2
Do you have a link about "Anderson coordinates"?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K