- 29,514
- 21,294
Worrying about that isn't physics.Trysse said:What is the distinction between "not experiencing time" and "experiencing ZERO time"? Does it not amount to the same?
The discussion revolves around the concept of proper time along light-like curves in the context of special relativity, particularly focusing on the implications of the Lorentz factor, ##\gamma##. Participants explore the nature of proper time, its definition, and its relevance (or lack thereof) when considering light-like trajectories.
Participants generally agree that proper time along a light-like curve is zero, but there is significant disagreement regarding the implications of this fact and its relevance to physical interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved on the broader implications of these interpretations.
Some participants note that the infinities associated with ##\gamma## as ##v \to c## are mathematically problematic and that evaluating ##\gamma## at ##v = c## is outside its defined domain. This raises questions about the proper interpretation of limits and the physical meaning of proper time in this context.
Worrying about that isn't physics.Trysse said:What is the distinction between "not experiencing time" and "experiencing ZERO time"? Does it not amount to the same?
I don't know. It's a question of semantics, not physics.Trysse said:What is the distinction between "not experiencing time" and "experiencing ZERO time"? Does it not amount to the same?