Undergrad Reichenbach Synchronisation: Proving i=r

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the relationship between the angle of incidence and the angle of reflection (i = r) using Reichenbach synchronisation and Anderson coordinates. The one-way speed of light (OWSOL) is defined as ##\frac{c}{2\epsilon}## in the x and y-directions, while the reverse direction is ##\frac{c}{2(1-\epsilon)}##, maintaining an average round trip speed of light of ##c##. The transformation between Minkowski and Anderson coordinates is established, demonstrating that the spatial coordinates remain unchanged while the temporal coordinate is affected, thus supporting the proof that the angles remain consistent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Reichenbach synchronisation
  • Familiarity with Minkowski and Anderson coordinates
  • Knowledge of null geodesics in spacetime
  • Basic grasp of the speed of light in different reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Reichenbach synchronisation in modern physics
  • Study the properties and applications of Anderson coordinates
  • Explore the derivation and significance of null geodesics
  • Investigate the relationship between light propagation and angles in various coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying relativity, particularly those interested in the geometric interpretation of light behavior and coordinate transformations.

wnvl2
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
I use Reichenbach synchronisation. The one-way speed of light (OWSOL) in the x and y-direction is ##\frac{c}{2\epsilon}## and in the reverse direction it is for both ##\frac{c}{2(1-\epsilon)}## such that the average round trip speed of light is ##c##. For any choice of ##\epsilon## the physical laws should remain the sames as for ##\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}##.

My goal is to prove that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. When using Huyghens it is obvous that I get a different result.

How can I prove ##i = r##?
mirror.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I use units where ##c=1## and Anderson coordinates so ##\kappa=2 \epsilon-1##. The transform between Minkowski coordinates (lower case) and Anderson coordinates (upper case) is: $$ t=T+\kappa X$$ $$x=X$$ $$y=Y$$ $$z=Z$$

So, in the Minkowski coordinates we can write the equation of an ingoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##\lambda<0## and the equation of an outgoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##0<\lambda##.

Then transforming from the Minkowski coordinates to the Anderson coordinates we get $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda + \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ and $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda - \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$

So the transformation does not affect the spatial coordinates, just the temporal coordinate. So the angle is the same in both cases.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and wnvl2
Do you have a link about "Anderson coordinates"?
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K