Reject vs Rejection: Understanding the Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between "reject" and "rejection" as nouns. "Reject" typically refers to an individual who has been excluded or dismissed by a group or institution, such as a societal reject. In contrast, "rejection" denotes the act of being turned down by an entity, which can apply to various contexts like relationships or academic submissions. For the specific case of a manuscript submitted to a journal, the appropriate term is "rejection." The manuscript itself can be referred to as a "reject," while the communication from the editors informing the author of the decision is termed a "rejection letter." This highlights the specific usage of both terms in the context of academic publishing.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
What's the difference between them as nouns?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The former would typically refer to somebody who's been rejected by some group or institution; a societal reject would be an example of this. The latter refers to the act of being rejected by some entity, which can be plural or singular, be it a love interest, college, or some corporation that found somebody better than the bloke they rejected.
 
Eclair_de_XII said:
The former would typically refer to somebody who's been rejected by some group or institution; a societal reject would be an example of this. The latter refers to the act of being rejected by some entity, which can be plural or singular, be it a love interest, college, or some corporation that found somebody better than the bloke they rejected.
Many thanks, but which word should be used for the rejection of a submitted manuscript to a journal?
 
feynman1 said:
rejection
Haven't you sort of answered your own question?
 
  • Like
Likes feynman1, russ_watters, Office_Shredder and 2 others
feynman1 said:
Many thanks, but which word should be used for the rejection of a submitted manuscript to a journal?
That is what you would use. "Rejection". You or they could then call the rejected manuscript, a "reject".
 
symbolipoint said:
That is what you would use. "Rejection". You or they could then call the rejected manuscript, a "reject".
To help with this example of the submitted manuscript, the editors would look at the manuscript, read and analyze the manuscript, and upon the editors' deciding to not accept the manuscript, they may send you a letter to communicate that , in written form, this letter reads to you that these editors are rejecting your manuscript. This letter to you explaining this, is a REJECTION; and you may call this a "rejection letter".

Now, the manuscript is a "reject" and the letter telling you this may simply be called, "rejection".
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.
Back
Top