Understanding the Relationship Between Momentum and Energy: A Classical Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCelt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around relating energy and momentum in the context of classical mechanics, particularly focusing on the equations governing kinetic energy and momentum. The original poster attempts to derive energy in terms of momentum using particle wavelengths, leading to confusion regarding the correct formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum, questioning the validity of using non-relativistic equations for massless particles. There is discussion about the implications of using different forms of energy equations and the relevance of group velocity in the context of wave-particle duality.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the differences between relativistic and non-relativistic scenarios. Some guidance has been provided regarding the appropriate equations to use, and there is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and assumptions involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to clarify whether the problem requires the use of wavelength, as well as the implications of using classical versus quantum mechanical approaches. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the nature of the particles involved and the equations applicable to them.

TheCelt
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Relate energy equation to the momentum equation for particles
Relevant Equations
$$\lambda = h/p$$
$$p = mv$$
$$E=1/2mv^2$$
I am trying to relate these equations to get the energy with respect to momentum based on particle wavelengths.

I did the following:

$$\lambda = h/p$$ so $$p= h/ \lambda $$

Then

$$p=mv$$ and $$E=1/2mv^2$$

So

$$E = pv/2 $$

But the answer was:

$$E = p^2/2m $$

I don't understand how they got this answer or why mine is wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheCelt said:
$$E=1/2mv^2$$
That equation is for the kinetic energy of a massive object at non-relativistic speeds.

It seems that you are trying to use the momentum of a massless particle (e.g. a burst of light) to compute the energy of that burst.

Let us look at the correct formulation for the relativistic kinetic energy first and see where the ##E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2## comes from...

You are, of course, familiar with ##E=mc^2##. That is the formula for the energy of a massive particle at rest.

When the particle is moving, the total energy (rest energy plus kinetic energy) is given by ##\gamma mc^2## where ##\gamma## is the factor: ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}##

If you subtract out the rest energy, what is left is the kinetic energy. This is given by ##(\gamma - 1)mc^2##. If you work through taking the derivatives of this with respect to v and turn it into a Taylor series, the first terms in the series will cancel out to zero and the first non-zero term will turn out to be ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2##.

But as I started out saying, we are not dealing with massive particles. We are dealing with massless particles moving at the speed of light. The relativistic ##\gamma## goes infinite. We cannot use the low speed approximation (##E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2##).

A proper way to proceed is with the energy-momentum equation: $$E^2 = m^2c^4 + p^2c^2$$Or:$$m^2c^4 = E^2 - p^2c^2$$In the latter form, this is a statement that "Invariant mass is the magnitude of the Energy-Momentum 4-vector".
 
The question involved non relativistic particles. Your answer is very different to the answer they give.
 
Are you requested to use the wavelength to do the problem? If you do it using "waves" you will need to use the group velocity.
 
I am unfamiliar with what group velocity is ?
 
TheCelt said:
Then

$$p=mv$$ and $$E=1/2mv^2$$

Solve the first equation for ##v##, and substitute the result into the second equation.
 
TheCelt said:
I am unfamiliar with what group velocity is ?
Then you probably shouldn't use quantum mechanical methods to prove the question. You should manipulate the classicle definitions as mentioned by @George Jones. Given mass momentum and KE you should be able to express each as a combination of the other two with facility.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K