- #1
LightPhoton
- 42
- 3
- TL;DR Summary
- Reasoning for the validity of relation between orthogonal accelerations in special relativity
We want to relate acceleration in two frames, an inertial frame S, and the instantaneous inertial reference frame of the particle on which it is being accelerated, S', which is moving in the ##x## direction at the moment. Let the acceleration in S be ##(a_x,a_y)## and in S' be ##(a_x',a_y')##. We want a relationship between them.
Now, here Morin argues that when consider the ##y## component we can write ##dy=dy'## and that ##dt'=dt/\gamma##, thus
$$a_y'=d^2y'/dt'^2=d^2y/(dt/\gamma)^2=\gamma^2a_y\tag1$$
But this seems wrong since we are taking the derivative of a factor of ##\gamma## here. If we go into a bit more detail then,
$$a_y=\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=\frac d{dt}\bigg(\frac{dy'}{\gamma dt'}\bigg)=\frac1{\gamma^2}a_y'+\underbrace{\frac{dy'}{dt'}}_{v'}\frac d{dt}\bigg(\frac1{\gamma}\bigg)$$
but since the particle is at rest with respect to itself ##(v'=0)##, the second term goes to zero and we get ##(1)##. Is this reasoning correct?
Now, here Morin argues that when consider the ##y## component we can write ##dy=dy'## and that ##dt'=dt/\gamma##, thus
$$a_y'=d^2y'/dt'^2=d^2y/(dt/\gamma)^2=\gamma^2a_y\tag1$$
But this seems wrong since we are taking the derivative of a factor of ##\gamma## here. If we go into a bit more detail then,
$$a_y=\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=\frac d{dt}\bigg(\frac{dy'}{\gamma dt'}\bigg)=\frac1{\gamma^2}a_y'+\underbrace{\frac{dy'}{dt'}}_{v'}\frac d{dt}\bigg(\frac1{\gamma}\bigg)$$
but since the particle is at rest with respect to itself ##(v'=0)##, the second term goes to zero and we get ##(1)##. Is this reasoning correct?
Last edited:
