Relating the CDF to the probability density

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
bonfire09
Messages
247
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it says that ##X## is a random variable with range ##[0, \infty]##.
 
bonfire09 said:

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.

Somebody has asked you to prove a false result. The correct version is
[tex]EX = \int_0^{\infty} [1 - F_X(x)] \,dx .[/tex]

Exactly how you should prove it depends on what you know about Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals, or whether you even need to use them. The proof is easiest if you assume that ##F_X(\cdot)## is absolutely continuous, in which case there is a density ##f_X(\cdot)## on ##(0,\infty)## giving ##F_X(x) = \int_0^x f_X(t) \, dt## for all ##x > 0##. If ##F_X## is not absolutely continuous, it can be continuous but not have a density function; then the proof is harder.

I suggest you try it first for the case where a density function exists. Think integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
bonfire09 said:

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.


haruspex said:
Are you sure about those limits? I don't see how E(X) can be independent of the behaviour of F between 0 and 1.

I agree; it should be [itex]E(X) = \int_0^\infty 1 - F_X(t)\,dt[/itex].

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.

This is an application of integration by parts. You want to calculate [tex] E(X) = \int_0^\infty xF_X'(x) \,dx.[/tex] Note that [tex] F_X'(x) = -\frac{d}{dx}(1 - F_X(x)).[/tex]