Relationship among LCM, GCD, and coprimes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andresc889
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd Relationship
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between the least common multiple (LCM) and greatest common divisor (GCD) of integers is established through the concept of coprimes. Specifically, when expressing LCM(a, b, c) as p*a = q*b = r*c, it follows that gcd(p, q, r) = 1, indicating that p, q, and r are coprime. This relationship is supported by the argument that if m and n share a common divisor greater than one, it leads to a contradiction regarding the definition of LCM. The discussion clarifies this property through examples and logical reasoning, confirming its validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of least common multiple (LCM) and greatest common divisor (GCD)
  • Familiarity with the concept of coprimes in number theory
  • Basic knowledge of integer properties and rational numbers
  • Ability to follow mathematical proofs and logical arguments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of coprime integers in number theory
  • Learn about the Euclidean algorithm for calculating GCD
  • Explore the relationship between LCM and GCD through specific examples
  • Investigate the implications of LCM and GCD in modular arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in the properties of integers and their relationships.

andresc889
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I am having an extremely hard time understanding a specific relationship that originates from the least common multiple of two or more numbers.

According to "Number Theory and Its History" by Oystein Ore, it is not difficult to see that when one writes

lcm(a,b,c) = p*a = q*b = r*c

Then

gcd(p,q,r) = 1

Meaning that p, q, and r are relatively prime (coprimes).

I have verified this property with several examples. However, I feel somewhat stupid because I cannot see why this is true, and Ore is saying "it is not difficult to see."

According to Wikipedia,

"(...) if a and b are two rationals (or integers), there are integers m and n such that LCM(a, b) = m × a = n × b. This implies that m and n are coprime; otherwise they could be divided by their common divisor, giving a common multiple less that the least common multiple, which is absurd."

I am not able to see how this argument works. Can anybody help me understand how this property is proven?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, it's saying that if m and n have a common divisor d>1, then (m/d)*a = (n/d)*b is also a common multiple of a and b. But (m/d)*a < m*a = LCM (a, b), so this is impossible. The same trick works with the three-variable version.
 
Thank you Citan. It finally makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
14K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K