Relationship between work and potential energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between work and potential energy in the context of a particle's kinetic and potential energy at two different times. The problem involves conservative and non-conservative forces affecting the energy of the particle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of mechanical energy under conservative forces and the implications when non-conservative forces are present. There are attempts to relate work done to changes in kinetic and potential energy, with some participants questioning the validity of their reasoning.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the relationships between work, kinetic energy, and potential energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider changes in energy when non-conservative forces are involved, and there is an exploration of how to calculate work done based on energy changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that only conservative forces act initially, but they are grappling with the implications of non-conservative forces in the latter part of the problem. There is also a mention of homework service feedback regarding the sign of the work done.

lzh
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At time ti, the kinetic energy of a particle is
35.5 J and its potential energy is 8.16 J.At
some later time tf , its kinetic energy is 9.38 J.
If only conservative forces act on the parti-
cle, what is its potential energy tf ? Answer
in units of J.
If the potential energy at time tf is 6.95 J,
what is the work done by the nonconservative
forces acting on the particle? Answer in units
of J.

Homework Equations


W=F*displacement*cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first part of the question, because there were only conservative forces, the sum of kinetic and potential must be same for both ti and tf. And i know that i have the right answer for that. But for the second part, where force isn't conserved, that would not be the case:
I CANNOT take the sum of 35.5 and 8.16 and subtract 6.95 like i did for the first part.
I don't think i completely understand the concept here, so i'd appreciate any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're missing a relationship between work and energy. W = ______

Fill in the blank and you should have your answer. Hint (you're not looking for W = Fd)
 
work is kinetic energy here, right?
 
and what else...
 
lzh said:
work is kinetic energy here, right?
No. When non-conservative forces act, total mechanical energy is not conserved. How much energy did you start with? What did you end up with? Can you explain this?
 
well, I started with 43.66J. But i don't know how much ends up being left.
 
wait... can this possibly be right?:
W=KE+PE
 
That's my line of thought...work done by non conservative forces= change in kinetic energy + change in potential energy
 
so does the answer to this part end up the same as first part of the question?
 
  • #10
lzh said:
so does the answer to this part end up the same as first part of the question?
No. The initial mechanical energy,
(KE + PE)_initial, is 43.66J. The final mechanical energy, (KE + PE)_final, is 16.33J. The difference between the two represents the change in the total mechanical energy of the system , which is, as stated above, equal to the work done by the non-conservative forces.
 
  • #11
would the change in mechanical energy be negative?
-27.33J in this case.
because +27.33J is wrong, according to my homework service
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Assuming you did the calculation right, the work should be negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K