Relative Momentum of Quarks in Mesons at Center of Mass Frame

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hluf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relative momentum of quarks in mesons, specifically addressing the equation q=1/2(p1-p2) at the center of mass frame. It is established that there is no single value for q; instead, it follows a distribution function due to the presence of virtual quarks and gluons within the meson. The mass of the charged pion is noted as 139.6 MeV/c², while the masses of the up and down quarks are between 1.7 to 3.0 MeV/c² and 4.1 to 5.7 MeV/c², respectively. The discussion concludes that the mass of individual quarks exceeds that of the pion due to binding energy and kinetic energy contributions from virtual particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of meson structure and quark composition
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass frame in particle physics
  • Knowledge of parton distribution functions
  • Basic principles of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of binding energy in hadron mass calculations
  • Study the implications of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of parton distribution functions in deep inelastic scattering
  • Investigate the differences between real and virtual quarks in meson dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the properties of mesons and quark interactions.

Hluf
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
When we study the bound state of quarks, i.e. mesons, the relative momentum is given as; q=1/2(p1-p2). Where p1 and 2, are momentum of quark and anti-quark, respectively.My question is, what is the value of q at center of mass frame? For example, P=(0,iM), at center of mass frame, where P is the momentum of meson.
Thank you, for your suggestions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't one single value. There is a distribution function of values.
 
Why not have a single value? For instance; q=1/2(p1-p2), if we consider at center of mass collision for equal mass particle, i.e. p1=(p,im1) and p2=-p[/B,im2] then q becomes
q=1/2((p1+p2),i(m1-m2))
but for equal mass, p1=p2)=p
where p is a vector
q=1/2(2p,0)⇔q=(p,0)→why not this, the value of q at center of mass frame?
 
You're assuming that there is nothing else inside the meson besides its valence quarks. In fact the quarks are immersed in a soup of virtual quarks and gluons. The energy and momenta of these virtual particles must be included in the description of the meson.
 
Mass of pion meson

We know pion is the composite of up and down quarks. The mass of charged pion is 139.6 Mev/c and mass of u=1.7 to 3.0 Mev/c2 and mass of
d=4.1 to 5.7Mev/c2. From these we see that the mass of single quark greater than the mass of the pion. This is my question, why? Any one voluntary answer my question, Thanks!
 
Mass of pion meson

We know pion is the composite of up and down quarks. The mass of charged pion is 139.6 Mev/Mev/c2 and mass of u=1.7 to 3.0 Mev/c2 and mass of
d=4.1 to 5.7Mev/c2. From these we see that the mass of single quark greater than the mass of the pion. This is my question, why? Any one voluntary answer my question, Thanks!
 
Most of the mass of the light hadrons (and the pion is a light hadron) comes from binding energy - or, as an alternative picture, the kinetic energy of the real and virtual particles inside.
Those quarks don't have a fixed momentum, they have a very broad distribution, given by the parton distribution functions.
 
Hluf said:
We know pion is the composite of up and down quarks. The mass of charged pion is 139.6 Mev/Mev/c2 and mass of u=1.7 to 3.0 Mev/c2 and mass of d=4.1 to 5.7Mev/c2. From these we see that the mass of single quark greater than the mass of the pion. This is my question, why? Any one voluntary answer my question, Thanks!
I think you dropped a decimal point. 5 MeV plus 5 MeV is not greater than 139 MeV.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K