Parity formulae, orbital angular momentum, mesons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the parity of systems of particles, specifically focusing on mesons composed of quark-antiquark pairs. Participants explore the relationship between intrinsic parity, orbital angular momentum, and the resulting parity of mesonic states, raising questions about the generality of these results and the assumptions underlying them.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that a particle has intrinsic parity ##\pm 1## and questions how the parity of a system follows from the product of intrinsic parities and the role of orbital angular momentum ##l##.
  • Another participant clarifies that ##l## is the angular momentum number and relates it to spherical harmonic functions, which have specific parity properties.
  • A later reply asserts that the total parity of a meson is given by the product of the intrinsic parities of the quark and antiquark, along with the orbital angular momentum, leading to the expression ##(-1)^{l+1}##.
  • One participant challenges the initial assumption that the parity of a system is simply the product of intrinsic parities, suggesting that the angular momentum's role is crucial in deriving the parity relation.
  • A question is raised about whether particle-antiparticle pairs always have opposite intrinsic parities, with a response indicating that this is true for fermions but not necessarily for bosons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the calculation of parity for systems of particles, particularly concerning the role of intrinsic parities versus angular momentum. There is no consensus on the initial assumptions or the generality of the results discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight potential misconceptions regarding the relationship between intrinsic parity and orbital angular momentum, suggesting that the derivation of parity may depend on specific conditions or definitions.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
So a particle has intrinsic parity ##\pm 1 ## .
The parity of a system of particles is given by product of intrinsic parities and the result is: ##(-1)^l ## (1).

Questions:

1) How does this result follow?
and what exactly is ##l## here? so it's the orbital angular momentum, so say a particle is made up of 3 quarks, then it's described to be in a certain state, ##1p## , ##1s## states etc, so ##l## is the orbital angular momentum of this state?

2) For a meson ##p=(-1)^{l+1}##
The reasoning in my book being that the quark and antiquark have opposite intrinsic parities,

So I assume this followss from (1), although I am not seeing how??

But, in the result (1) , this is a general result for any system of particles right? So quarks and antiquarks of the same type could be included in any system yet ## (-1)^l ## still holds?Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump.
 
l is the angular momentum number. The particles in general will be described by spherical harmonic functions Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) which have the given parity:
\hat{P} Y_{lm} (\theta, \phi) \equiv Y_{lm} (\pi-\theta, \phi+ \pi)= (-1)^l Y_{lm} (\theta, \phi)

Take for example a meson.
The meson will have a quark and antiquark q, \bar{q}.
So the intrinsic parity of the one will be +1 and the parity of the other will be -1.
On the other hand, the meson can have some spatial angular momentum number l.
So the total parity will be: (+1) \times (-1) \times (-1)^l = (-1)^{l+1}
 
So I guess you make a wrong assumption before your eq.1.
"The parity of a system of particles is given by product of intrinsic parities "
This is wrong (probably a misconception).

Again take a meson... it is a q \bar{q} state with some angular momentum l due to the quarks. Since the meson has an orbital angular momentum l, its angular distributions are described by the spherical harmonics Y_{lm}. It's from this relation that you get the eq.1 (-1)^l, and not by getting the intrinsic parities.
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/reviews/quarkmodrpp.pdf
Sec. 14.2
 
ChrisVer said:
l
The meson will have a quark and antiquark q, \bar{q}.
So the intrinsic parity of the one will be +1 and the parity of the other will be -1.

Is this always the case with a particle and antiparticle, that they have opposite parities?
 
binbagsss said:
Is this always the case with a particle and antiparticle, that they have opposite parities?
For fermions, yes. For bosons, no.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K