Relative Velocity: Jack & Particle - v to V

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relative velocity between an observer (Jack) and a particle in motion. When Jack jogs past an observer at speed v, he perceives the observer moving at the same speed v in his own frame. However, when considering a particle moving in a circular path, the concept of a "rest frame" becomes complex due to the particle's non-inertial nature. The discussion clarifies that a momentarily co-moving reference frame must be defined at each point along the particle's trajectory to accurately measure the observer's velocity, which remains consistent at speed v from the particle's perspective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Knowledge of inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Familiarity with circular motion dynamics
  • Concept of momentarily co-moving reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail to understand velocity measurements
  • Explore the implications of non-inertial frames in special relativity
  • Investigate the dynamics of circular motion in physics
  • Learn about momentarily co-moving reference frames and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in the principles of relativity, particularly those studying motion and reference frames in both inertial and non-inertial contexts.

Izzhov
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
First, a really basic one: if Jack is jogging past me with a constant speed, and I observe that speed to be v in my frame, with what speed will Jack observe me to be moving, as measured from his own frame? If the answer is not v, which Lorentz transformation do I use to derive it?

Second, a slightly more advanced one: say I'm in a lab and I measure a particle to be moving in a circle, in which I am in the direct center, with constant speed v. In the rest frame of the particle, what speed would it measure me to be moving around it? If this answer differs from the first question, whence the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Izzhov said:
First, a really basic one: if Jack is jogging past me with a constant speed, and I observe that speed to be v in my frame, with what speed will Jack observe me to be moving, as measured from his own frame? If the answer is not v, which Lorentz transformation do I use to derive it?
It's v.

Second, a slightly more advanced one: say I'm in a lab and I measure a particle to be moving in a circle, in which I am in the direct center, with constant speed v. In the rest frame of the particle, what speed would it measure me to be moving around it? If this answer differs from the first question, whence the difference?
Same answer.
 
Nugatory said:
Izzhov said:
Second, a slightly more advanced one: say I'm in a lab and I measure a particle to be moving in a circle, in which I am in the direct center, with constant speed v. In the rest frame of the particle, what speed would it measure me to be moving around it? If this answer differs from the first question, whence the difference?
Same answer.
Actually, I wouldn't give the same answer. The problem is that the question is not complete. There is no standard meaning to "the rest frame of the particle" when the particle is non-inertial. You would have to define that frame before you could answer the question.
 
DaleSpam said:
Actually, I wouldn't give the same answer. The problem is that the question is not complete. There is no standard meaning to "the rest frame of the particle" when the particle is non-inertial. You would have to define that frame before you could answer the question.

In this context, I would define it as a frame whose origin coincides with the particle at all times and whose axes are parallel to the lab frame's axes. Thus the particle would measure me moving circularly around it.
 
There is no single "rest frame" for a particle moving in circular motion about a central observer. What you can do is, at each point on the particle's trajectory, attach an inertial frame to the particle whose velocity coincides with that of the particle, at that point. Such a frame is called a momentarily co-moving reference frame. For circular motion, the momentarily co-moving reference frames will necessarily be different at each point on the particle's trajectory.
 
Izzhov said:
In this context, I would define it as a frame whose origin coincides with the particle at all times and whose axes are parallel to the lab frame's axes. Thus the particle would measure me moving circularly around it.
The only real way to specify this is to write down the transform from the inertial frame. Otherwise a specification like the one you mentioned leaves the length scale, time scale, and simultaneity convention ambiguous.
 
WannabeNewton said:
There is no single "rest frame" for a particle moving in circular motion about a central observer. What you can do is, at each point on the particle's trajectory, attach an inertial frame to the particle whose velocity coincides with that of the particle, at that point. Such a frame is called a momentarily co-moving reference frame. For circular motion, the momentarily co-moving reference frames will necessarily be different at each point on the particle's trajectory.

Ok, so from each of these co-moving frames, with what velocity will the particle measure me to be traveling circularly around it?
 
You already answered that. At each instant, in a momentarily co-moving inertial frame, the particle will see you move with a velocity opposite from that of the co-moving inertial frame. So if we keep moving along with the particle, you will just be moving in a circle with the same speed from the particle's perspective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
877
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
941
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K