Relativistic Antiproton Protion

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the kinetic energy (KE) required for a proton to produce a static antiproton, specifically addressing the formula "m^2c^4 - p^2c^2 = m_0^2c^4". This equation is a rearrangement of Einstein's energy-momentum relation, E^2 = m_0^2c^4 + p^2c^2, where 'm' represents the relativistic mass. The confusion arises from the interpretation of the invariant mass in relation to the moving proton and the static antiproton, which is clarified as applicable to any proton.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's energy-momentum relation
  • Familiarity with relativistic mass concepts
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Einstein's energy-momentum relation in detail
  • Explore the concept of relativistic mass and its implications in particle physics
  • Investigate the properties of antiprotons and their production mechanisms
  • Learn about invariant mass and its applications in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, relativistic mechanics, and energy-momentum relationships. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking clarity on the interactions between protons and antiprotons.

alex3
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
This isn't really so much of a homework problem, but I'm reading this webpage, and there's one part of the derivation of the required proton KE needed to produce a static antiproton.

The part that's puzzling me is

"and using... m2inc4 - p2inc2 = m20c4 "

I don't see where this formula is coming from. I can see the resemblance to the invariant, but the RHS deals with the moving proton, and the LHS only has the mass of a single proton, I'm confused as to why it's not (2m0)2c4.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alex3 said:
The part that's puzzling me is

"and using... m2inc4 - p2inc2 = m20c4 "

I don't see where this formula is coming from.
This is just a rearrangement of the usual Einstein formula:

[tex]E^2 = m_0^2c^4 + p^2c^2[/tex]

[tex]m^2c^4 = m_0^2c^4 + p^2c^2[/tex]

[tex]m^2c^4 - p^2c^2 = m_0^2c^4[/tex]

where m is the 'relativistic mass'.

(This formula is derived on the page just before the one you linked.)

I can see the resemblance to the invariant, but the RHS deals with the moving proton, and the LHS only has the mass of a single proton,
I'm not sure what you mean. This is the invariant. It's true for any proton, including the incoming one.
 
Aha of course, elementary really. Thanks very much for the clarification!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K