Relativistic kinetic energy derivation (from Work expended)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, denoted as T, from work expended W is established through the integration of force over distance, leading to the expression T = (γ - 1)mc². The Lorentz factor γ is defined as γ = 1 / √(1 - v²/c²), where v is the velocity and c is the speed of light. The discussion outlines the integration process and manipulation of equations, ultimately confirming the correct form of relativistic kinetic energy. The final result is derived by substituting and rearranging terms, demonstrating the relationship between kinetic energy and relativistic effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and Newton's laws
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor in special relativity
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Concept of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz factor γ in detail
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in calculus
  • Learn about the implications of relativistic effects on mass and energy
  • Investigate applications of relativistic kinetic energy in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on special relativity, as well as educators seeking to explain the derivation of relativistic kinetic energy.

freddie_mclair
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I'm trying to get the relativistic kinetic energy, ## T ##, from the work expended, ## W ##, (assuming that the body is at rest initially) and I'm doing it like this (in 1D):

\begin{equation}
W = T = \int F ds = m \int \frac{d(\gamma u)}{dt}u dt = m\int u d(\gamma u)
\end{equation}

Where, ## u ## is the speed, and ## \gamma ## the Lorentz factor.
Now, putting some limits on it, and integrating by parts:

\begin{align}
T &= \gamma m u^2 \Big|_{0}^{v} - m \int_0^v \gamma u du \\
&= \gamma m v^2 - m \int_0^v \gamma u du \\
&= \gamma m v^2 - m \int_0^v \frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}} du\\
&= \gamma m v^2 + m c^2 \sqrt{1-u^2/c^2} \Big|_0^v\\
&= \gamma m v^2 + m c^2 \sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} - mc^2
\end{align}

I can also write it as:

\begin{align}
T &= \gamma m v^2 + \frac{mc^2}{\gamma} - mc^2
\end{align}

But to me it looks like a dead end here...

Well, what I really want to get is the relativistic kinetic energy written like this: ##T = (\gamma - 1)mc^2 ##.
Could you give me some advice if I'm doing this correctly, and if so, how to proceed from here?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\gamma m v^2-mc^2+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}=mc^2(\gamma \frac{v^2}{c^1}-1)+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}=mc^2 (\gamma (1+1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})-1)+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}.
I think you can continue yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: freddie_mclair
Just try substituting for ##\gamma## and shuffling that last expression around a bit.
 
Shyan said:
\gamma m v^2-mc^2+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}=mc^2(\gamma \frac{v^2}{c^1}-1)+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}=mc^2 (\gamma (1+1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})-1)+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}.
I think you can continue yourself.

Oh, cool!
Then from your expression (with a tiny corrections on the exponential factor of ## c^1 ## and a change of sign in the ## 1 + 1 ## trick), it follows:

\begin{align}
\gamma m v^2-mc^2+\frac{mc^2}{\gamma}\\
m c^2 \Big(\gamma \frac{v^2}{c^2}-1 \Big)+\frac{m c^2}{\gamma} \\
m c^2 \Big[\gamma \Big( 1 - 1 + \frac{v^2}{c^2}\Big) - 1 \Big]+\frac{m c^2}{\gamma} \\
m c^2 \Big[\gamma \Big( 1 - \gamma^{-2} \Big) - 1 \Big]+\frac{m c^2}{\gamma}\\
m c^2 \Big( \gamma - \frac{1}{\gamma} -1 \Big)+\frac{m c^2}{\gamma}\\
\gamma m c^2 - \frac{m c^2}{\gamma} - m c^2 +\frac{m c^2}{\gamma}\\
\gamma m c^2 - m c^2 = (\gamma - 1)mc^2
\end{align}

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
941
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K