Relativistic mass for an interstellar craft

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of relativistic mass for interstellar spacecraft designs, specifically those like Daedalus and antimatter-powered ships. At speeds approaching 0.5c, relativistic mass increases by approximately 15%, raising concerns about structural integrity during travel. However, it is clarified that relativistic mass is an observational effect and does not impose physical limitations on the spacecraft's design from the perspective of the astronauts onboard. Special relativity does not prevent the construction of high-speed craft capable of interstellar travel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with relativistic mass calculations
  • Knowledge of spacecraft design concepts
  • Awareness of antimatter propulsion technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relativistic mass in spacecraft engineering
  • Explore the design principles of the Daedalus spacecraft
  • Study antimatter propulsion systems and their theoretical limits
  • Learn about the effects of relativistic speeds on time dilation and length contraction
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of interstellar travel and the effects of relativistic physics on spacecraft design.

Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
So there have been some theoretical designs for ships in the past that would be used for interstellar missions, i.e. Daedalus, Ramjet, Orion, etc. that may send ships to near relativistic speeds. I think daedalus had a max. speed goal of around .1c. My question is do you think that relativistic mass could be the downfall of these designs? I don't think around .1c would be fast enough to warrant relativistic treatment of the flight, but I have read that some antimatter powered designs could potentially reach .4-.5c which would certainly be relativistic.

So by special relativity, say an antimatter powered ship is going ~.5c

m = m0 / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2)

m = m0 / sqrt(1-.5^2)

m = m0 / .866 = 1.155 m0

So a ship at this speed would have gained 15% more mass than when it left earth. Woudln't all of this extra mass cause enough stress on the structure of the ship to practically rip it apart? I don't really know where the extra mass comes from, but I assume that the ship would be basically growing as it speeds up towards c? Or is the "relativistic mass" basically just the mass change as measured from an observer on earth, whereas the astronauts on the ship would not notice any difference in the mass, or length for that matter, of the ship?

Does relativity basically preclude us from building super fast craft, because the mass growth of the ship would basically destroy the design of the ship?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hercuflea said:
Or is the "relativistic mass" basically just the mass change as measured from an observer on earth, whereas the astronauts on the ship would not notice any difference in the mass, or length for that matter, of the ship?

That is correct. Relativistic mass is the apparent Newtonian mass of a moving object and is purely an observational effect.

Hercuflea said:
Does relativity basically preclude us from building super fast craft, because the mass growth of the ship would basically destroy the design of the ship?

Special relativity do not impose any special limit to where you (as an astronaut in a suitably build spaceship) can go in the visible universe. You are even allowed to go to Andromeda, our next door galaxy neighbor, if you really want to. See [1] for some details.

[1] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K