For the second, with hypothesis "If H,K<G, K<N_G(H), then blahblah", draw a picture. Then notice how it "makes sense" that K/(HnK) ~ HK/K, in the sense that HnK is to K what H is to HK.
The third is easy. It says that if N,M and normal in G and N is in M, then the "fraction" (G/N)/(M/N) can be "simplified": (G/N)/(M/N) ~ G/M.
Actally you just have to remember the formula (G/N)/(M/N) ~ G/M because for it to make any sense, we must have that N and M are normal in G and that N in in M, otherwise G/M, G/N and M/n are not defined.