Repeated Eigenvalue of a n=3 system of differential equations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a system of differential equations characterized by a matrix with repeated eigenvalues of λ = -1. The first eigenvector identified is (1, 2, -1), but there is uncertainty about the next steps, particularly due to the complexity of handling a 3x3 matrix compared to 2x2 matrices. References to Jordan Canonical Form suggest it may be necessary for finding a complete solution, as it allows for the handling of generalized eigenvectors. The analytic matrix function approach is also discussed, indicating how to construct the solution using matrix exponentials. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the differential equation system effectively.
tehdiddulator
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



x' = \begin{pmatrix}0&1&3\\2&-1&2\\-1&0&-2\end{pmatrix}*x





The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the repeated eigenvalues to be λ_{1,2,3}=-1
I've also found the first (and only non zero eigenvector) to be \begin{pmatrix}1&2&-1\end{pmatrix}, but I'm not entirely sure where to go from here. Everything I've found talks about 2x2 matrices. Even looking around on MIT opencoursewares site, they say that its possible but is beyond the scope of that class...I did find some reference to using Jourdan Canonical form may possibly be used, but I don't remember him talking too much about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tehdiddulator said:

Homework Statement



x' = \begin{pmatrix}0&1&3\\2&-1&2\\-1&0&-2\end{pmatrix}*x





The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the repeated eigenvalues to be λ_{1,2,3}=-1
I've also found the first (and only non zero eigenvector) to be \begin{pmatrix}1&2&-1\end{pmatrix}, but I'm not entirely sure where to go from here. Everything I've found talks about 2x2 matrices. Even looking around on MIT opencoursewares site, they say that its possible but is beyond the scope of that class...I did find some reference to using Jourdan Canonical form may possibly be used, but I don't remember him talking too much about that.

That's Jordan.. Here's a wiki article about Jordan Normal Form. The section on generalized eigenvectors that might be of help.
 
tehdiddulator said:

Homework Statement



x' = \begin{pmatrix}0&1&3\\2&-1&2\\-1&0&-2\end{pmatrix}*x





The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the repeated eigenvalues to be λ_{1,2,3}=-1
I've also found the first (and only non zero eigenvector) to be \begin{pmatrix}1&2&-1\end{pmatrix}, but I'm not entirely sure where to go from here. Everything I've found talks about 2x2 matrices. Even looking around on MIT opencoursewares site, they say that its possible but is beyond the scope of that class...I did find some reference to using Jourdan Canonical form may possibly be used, but I don't remember him talking too much about that.

For a matrix A having a single eigenvalue ##r## of multiplicity 3 the analytic matrix function f(A) = c_0 I + c_1 A + c_2 A^2 + c_3 A^3 + \cdots (corresponding to the ordinary analytic function ##f(x) = c_0 + c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + \cdots ##) is of the form
f(A) = E_1 f(r) + E_2 f'(r) + E_3 f''(r) for some fixed matrices ##E_1, E_2, E_3## which are the same for all functions f. We can determine the ##E_1## by looking at special cases of f: for ##f(x) = x^0 = 1## we have ##f'x) = f''(x) = 0##, so ##I = A^0 = 1 E_1 + 0 E_2 + 0 E_3 = E_1##. For##f(x) = x## we have ##f'(x) = 1, f''(x) = 0## and so ##A = r E_1 + 1 E_2 ##. For ##f(x) = x^2## we have ##f'(x) = 2x, f''(x) = 2## and so ##A^2 = r^2 E_1 + 2r E_2 + 2 E_3.## Altogether, we have the three equations
E_1 = I\\<br /> r E_1 + E_2 = A\\<br /> r^2 E_1 + 2r E_2 + 2E_3 = A^2.
Once we have the ##E_i## we can solve the differential equation system using the matrix exponential ##M(t) = e^{At}##. This will have the form
M(t) = e^{rt} E_1 + t e^{rt} E_2 + t^2 e^{rt} E_3,
obtained from the function ##f(x) = e^{xt}.##

This all follows by looking at the Jordan Canonical Form. Note, however, that the discussion above applies equally whether the matrix has a diagonal Jordan form, or one block of size 1 and one of size 2, or a single Jordan block of size 3; those separate cases will just correspond to situations in which some ##E_i## are zero. For example, if A were diagonalizable but with a single eigenvalue r of multiplicity 3, we would just have ##E_2 = E_3 = 0##.
 
tehdiddulator said:

Homework Statement



x' = \begin{pmatrix}0&1&3\\2&-1&2\\-1&0&-2\end{pmatrix}*x





The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the repeated eigenvalues to be λ_{1,2,3}=-1
I've also found the first (and only non zero eigenvector) to be \begin{pmatrix}1&2&-1\end{pmatrix}, but I'm not entirely sure where to go from here. Everything I've found talks about 2x2 matrices. Even looking around on MIT opencoursewares site, they say that its possible but is beyond the scope of that class...I did find some reference to using Jourdan Canonical form may possibly be used, but I don't remember him talking too much about that.

For a matrix A having a single eigenvalue ##r## of multiplicity 3 the analytic matrix function f(A) = c_0 I + c_1 A + c_2 A^2 + c_3 A^3 + \cdots (corresponding to the ordinary analytic function ##f(x) = c_0 + c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + \cdots ##) is of the form
f(A) = E_1 f(r) + E_2 f&#039;(r) + E_3 f&#039;&#039;(r) for some fixed matrices ##E_1, E_2, E_3## which a re the same for all functions f. We can determine the ##E_1## by looking at special cases of f: for ##f(x) = x^0 = 1## we have ##f'x) = f''(x) = 0##, so ##I = A^0 = 1 E_1 + 0 E_2 + 0 E_3 = E_1##. For##f(x) = x## we have ##f'(x) = 1, f''(x) = 0## and so ##A = r E_1 + 1 E_2 ##. For ##f(x) = x^2## we have ##f'(x) = 2x, f''(x) = 2## and so ##A^2 = r^2 E_1 + 2r E_2 + 2 E_3.## Altogether, we have the three equations
E_1 = I\\<br /> r E_1 + E_2 = A\\<br /> r^2 E_1 + 2r E_2 + 2E_3 = A^2.
Once we have the ##E_i## we can solve the differential equation system using the matrix exponential ##M(t) = e^{At}##. This will have the form
M(t) = e^{rt} E_1 + t e^{rt} E_2 + t^2 e^{rt} E_3,
obtained from the function ##f(x) = e^{xt}.##
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
979
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K