Replacement for Campbell's Biology

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bassir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology
AI Thread Summary
Many users express dissatisfaction with Campbell's Biology, citing a desire for a more unified approach to the subject rather than a focus on memorizing facts. The discussion emphasizes the need for resources that enhance understanding of biological concepts rather than overwhelming students with details. One recommended alternative is "Life: The Science of Biology," though concerns are raised that it may also be dense with information. Participants suggest exploring university curricula for introductory biology courses as a way to find structured readings that align with their learning goals. Overall, the conversation highlights a common struggle with the traditional textbook format and the quest for more engaging and concept-driven biology resources.
Bassir
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I'm using Campbell's Biology*and I'm really sort of sick of it and wondering if there are better alternatives to it.

What do you guys think? Am I alone on this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to find an appropriate replacement, I'd recommend specifying what about the book you dislike. Do you want more mathematics? A more unified approach to biology? More emphasis on a certain topic?
 
I want a more unified approach to biology to help me understand the concepts, I feel Campbell is basically piling information upon information and forgetting the broad concepts of things that make Biology interesting. It goes from being an interesting field to a list of details and facts needed for regurgitation on exams.

I want to learn Biology, not learn a bunch of facts.
 
Bassir said:
I want a more unified approach to biology to help me understand the concepts, I feel Campbell is basically piling information upon information and forgetting the broad concepts of things that make Biology interesting. It goes from being an interesting field to a list of details and facts needed for regurgitation on exams.

I want to learn Biology, not learn a bunch of facts.

A good alternative to Campbell is "Life: The Science of biology", but I am afraid you will find it as full of information as Campbell. Both are very good at concepts, IMO. My personal preference leans toward "Life:...".

If you study biology by yourself perhaps a good way is to look in the curriculum offered by some universities for introductory biology courses and follow a similar path with your readings. Campbell is widely used so perhaps you can even find readings with page numbers on internet for some courses.
 
I think I have the same problem with Campbell. However, when I really get myself to read it, it is interesting, but time consuming. Once it gets time consuming it turns you off.

I have seen people use the book https://www.amazon.com/dp/0131005065/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and like it. It has been recommended above. I found it alright.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
17K
Replies
8
Views
232
Writing: Input Wanted Alien chiral chemistry
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top