MHB Represent the following inequalities on a single graph

ai93
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
$$3x+4y\le12$$
$$3x+y\ge3$$
$$y\ge-1$$

I understand the how to plot these on a graph, just not sure how to solve these inequalities!

Do you have to solve for x or y?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you plot the 3 lines corresponding to the 3 inequalities, you should find that the triangular region bounded by the lines (including the boundaries because the inequalities are weak) forms the solution set.
 
MarkFL said:
When you plot the 3 lines corresponding to the 3 inequalities, you should find that the triangular region bounded by the lines (including the boundaries because the inequalities are weak) forms the solution set.

I thought you would have to solve the inequalities first?
 
mathsheadache said:
I thought you would have to solve the inequalities first?

Each inequality will have as its solution part of the $xy$-plane. That part of the plane where the three solutions all intersect will be the solution to the system of inequalities, and you should find this in the region bounded by the 3 lines corresponding to the 3 inequalities.

View attachment 3797
 

Attachments

  • inequalities.png
    inequalities.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 71
MarkFL said:
Each inequality will have as its solution part of the $xy$-plane. That part of the plane where the three solutions all intersect will be the solution to the system of inequalities, and you should find this in the region bounded by the 3 lines corresponding to the 3 inequalities.

View attachment 3797

We have to solve for $$y$$ to determine the linear equations that serve as boundaries for the described region.

Would this be right?

3x+4y≤12
4y$$\le$$12-3(0)
4y$$\le$$12
y$$\ge$$3

3x+y$$\ge$$3
y$$\ge$$3-3(0)
y$$\ge$$3

y$$\ge$$-1
This can already be put on the graph?
 
First, let's look at the inequality:

$$3x+4y\le12$$

The boundary will be the corresponding line:

$$3x+4y=12$$

So, we need to graph this line, and an easy way is to fivide through by 12 so that it is in the two-intercept form:

$$\frac{x}{4}+\frac{y}{3}=1$$

Hence, we know the points $(4,0)$ and $(0,3)$ are on the line. Plot these points and then draw the line through them. Then, if we use the origin as a test point, we see that:

$$3(0)+4(0)\le12$$

is true, so we know we want the points below this line (on the same side of the line as the origin). Can you use this same technique for the second inequality to determine its solution?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top