By the Principle of Superposition, a state vector can be defined as pic.01(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

also, the state vector can represent a wave function in a continuous case as pic.02

My (1) question is, in pic.03, why the state vector can be pulled out from the integral???

I have an idea but I think it should be wrong:

------------

As shown in pic.02, the state vector is a set of values that each element is the value of the wave function, e.g. phi(0), phi(0.002), etc.

Thus, it can be considered as a constant since every elements will never change

Therefore, it can be pulled out from the integral

-------------

However, this idea is fail to explain in the observable case.

Considering, in pic.04, question (2), Q is an operator which contain a momentum component, a differential operator. If the state vector is constant, it should give zero value when a momentum operator act on it and the Dirac representation will be failed.

So, if it is not a constant, how can it be pulled out from the integral????????

========================

And my (2) question is that, in pic.04,

step 4 to step 5,

why the operator Q can skip the bra(x) vector and act on the state vector???????

=========================

Thank you so much as I'm new in Quantum Mechanics!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Representation between State Vector & Wave Function

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Representation between State | Date |
---|---|

I What's the interval between photons in stimulated emission? | Jan 19, 2018 |

A Who wrote "Ch 6 Groups & Representations in QM"? | Jan 11, 2018 |

B Gravity and spin 2 representation | Jan 6, 2018 |

A Transformation of position operator under rotations | Nov 27, 2017 |

I Dirac equation solved in Weyl representation | Nov 15, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**