Representing Mixed States in Hilbert Space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of mixed states in Hilbert space, contrasting them with pure states. Participants explore the theoretical implications and mathematical foundations of representing these states, touching on concepts from quantum mechanics and linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why mixed states cannot be represented as rays in Hilbert space, noting that mixed states correspond to statistical mixtures of pure states.
  • Another participant argues that the statistics of measurements differ between pure and mixed states, highlighting that pure states allow for certain measurement outcomes while mixed states do not have a definitive direction for measurement outcomes.
  • A suggestion is made to explore an explicit example to better understand the representation of mixed states.
  • One participant presents an algebraic argument related to matrix representations, asserting that not every matrix can be expressed as a product of two vectors, providing a counterexample to illustrate this point.
  • A later reply emphasizes that quantum states are defined as positive operators of unit trace, distinguishing between pure states and mixed states, and suggesting that the discussion could benefit from focusing on the definitions rather than the Hilbert space representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the representation of mixed states, with some advocating for a focus on definitions and others emphasizing the mathematical structure. No consensus is reached regarding the representation of mixed states in Hilbert space.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of quantum states and their mathematical representations, which may not be universally agreed upon. The implications of these definitions on the representation of states in Hilbert space remain unresolved.

Muthumanimaran
Messages
79
Reaction score
2
Why cannot we represent mixed states with a ray in a Hilbert space like a Pure state.
I know Mixed states corresponds to statistical mixture of pure states, If we are able to represent Pure state as a ray in Hilbert space, why we can't represent mixed states as ray or superposition of rays in Hilbert space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the statistics don't work out.

If you have a spin-1/2 particle in a given pure state, the outcome of a spin measurement depends on the direction you measure. For example, there's always a direction where you get one of the outcomes with certainty. For mixed states, such a direction doesn't exist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
The best way to understand why this cannot be done is to try to do it on an explicit simple example. Have you tried?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kith
Muthumanimaran said:
why we can't represent mixed states as ray or superposition of rays in Hilbert space.
Algebraically, it is closely related to the following claim. Not every matrix ##C_{ij}## can be written as ##A_iB_j##.

How to prove it? By counterexample. Assume ##C_{ij}=A_iB_j##. As an example, consider the case ##C_{12}=0##. Then either ##A_1=0## or ##B_2=0##. But if ##A_1=0## then ##C_{11}=0##, and if ##B_2=0## then ##C_{22}=0##. Therefore the assumption cannot be satisfied when ##C_{12}=0##, ##C_{11}\neq 0##, and ##C_{22}\neq 0##. Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Muthumanimaran and Nugatory
How to prove it? By counterexample. Assume ##C_{ij}=A_iB_j##. As an example, consider the case ##C_{12}=0##. Then either ##A_1=0## or ##B_2=0##. But if ##A_1=0## then ##C_{11}=0##, and if ##B_2=0## then ##C_{22}=0##. Therefore the assumption cannot be satisfied when ##C_{12}=0##, ##C_{11}\neq 0##, and ##C_{22}\neq 0##. Q.E.D.[/QUOTE]

Thank you, your answer is simple and elegant.
 
No need to prove anything. Its simple.

By definition quantum states are positive operators of unit trace. Forget this Hilbert space stuff - that's the kiddy version. By definition pure states are operators of the form |u><u|. Mixed states, again by definition, are convex sums of pure states. It can be shown all states are mixed or pure (start a new thread if you want to discuss it). Obviously pure states can be mapped to rays in a Hilbert space - but keep in mind in general states are operators.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K