I'm a little bit confused about how coordinate systems work once we have chosen a basis for a vector space. Let's take R^2 for example. It is known that if we write a vector in R^2 numerically, it must always be with respect to some basis. So the vector [1, 2] represents the point (1, 2) in the xy-plane if we take our basis vectors to be the standard ones. However, I am a bit confused by this. If we let i and j be the basis vectors, the the coordinate vector [1, 2] is more fundamentally represented by 1i + 2j. However, what then, do i and j represent? One might say that i is [1, 0] and j is [0, 1]. However, this definition seems circular, because we are then using the standard basis to define the standard basis vectors... So how are i and j defined, without referencing the standard basis to define them? The same question goes for any other basis vectors we may find. How can we define these basis vectors without having to reference the standard basis?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Representing vectors with respect to a basis

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Representing vectors respect | Date |
---|---|

Can quaternion group be represented by 3x3 matricies? | Aug 30, 2015 |

Verifying that a matrix T represents a projection operation | Jun 9, 2014 |

How do we represent multidimensional data vectors on a 2D plot. | Aug 8, 2013 |

Representing algebraic numbers. | Jun 4, 2013 |

Using vectors to represent integers | Oct 28, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**