Resistance: Documentary on Antibotics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the documentary "Resistance," which addresses the misuse of antibiotics in human medicine and agriculture, highlighting the issue of antibiotic resistance. Participants explore the implications of antibacterial products, particularly focusing on their effects on health and the environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern over the misuse of antibiotics and the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs, sharing personal reflections on their antibiotic use.
  • There is a discussion about the safety and efficacy of bleach as an antimicrobial agent, with some participants arguing it does not contribute to antibiotic resistance or act as an endocrine disruptor.
  • Others raise questions about the use of bleach and its effectiveness compared to other disinfectants, such as isopropyl alcohol, and whether they share similar properties regarding resistance and health impacts.
  • Triclosan is mentioned as a problematic component of many antibacterial products, with some participants citing studies that suggest it may act as an endocrine disruptor and contribute to antibiotic resistance.
  • Participants discuss the potential environmental impacts of triclosan, including its breakdown into dioxins and the effects on ecosystems, particularly in relation to wastewater discharge.
  • There are differing views on the necessity of antibacterial products in maintaining health, with some suggesting that exposure to pathogens can strengthen the immune system.
  • Some participants provide detailed descriptions of various disinfectants and their mechanisms, including sodium hypochlorite, alcohol, and hydrogen peroxide, while discussing their respective roles in preventing resistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the safety and necessity of antibacterial products. There are competing views on the implications of using bleach versus other disinfectants, as well as differing opinions on the health effects of triclosan and the concept of cleanliness.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on anecdotal evidence regarding personal cleaning habits and the varying interpretations of scientific studies related to triclosan and its effects. The discussion also reflects differing levels of understanding regarding the mechanisms of various disinfectants.

Messages
19,911
Reaction score
10,928
Last night I watched a good documentary on Netflix Instant called "Resistance". It discusses the issue of antibiotics in human medicine and agriculture. Lots of interesting history with debate about how we've badly mishandled antibiotics. Some heart breaking stories of people who caught an antibiotic resistant super bug (and died). Seems like a pretty big issue. I will be more cautious getting antibiotics, making sure I use them to term and stop buying antibacterial cleaning products.

http://www.resistancethefilm.com/
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
...and stop buying antibacterial cleaning products.
I never have =]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
What about bleach, I've always used bleach. I use it in and on my toilets, my tile floors, my kitchen counters, my (bleach proof) clothes.
 
I don't think that applies in the same way. You're killing pathogens before they get into your body, but only within the house. You still go out and about and are exposed to things in the air (which helps keep your immune system strong).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
Antiseptics are not so easily resisted in the concentrations allowed on inert surfaces. Sodium hypochlorite 'bleach' is prime among these. At lower concentrations, allowing some pathogen survival, resistant populations are favorably selected and can become the dominant strain.

Also alcohol, chlorhexidine (a favorite), quaternary ammoniums, boric acid, hydrogen peroxide (a favorite bleach from sodium perchlorate), peracetic acid, phenols (why paper toweling is effective), sodium chloride (weak diluted), sodium bicarbonate. Cold alcohol-CO2 vapor is used to clean ER/OR. Do not discount good ol' fashioned soap (contra detergent).

I clean bathroom/toilet surfaces with sodium hypochlorite bleach, not least for the bleaching action on metallic marks as from finger rings.

While I struggled to maintain my hot tub antiseptic, I used bromine rather than chlorine, and 'shocked' with potassium peroxymonosulfate (Oxone/potassium monopersulfate). I studied going to hydrogen peroxide, but shipping high grade H2O2 is expensive! as a 'hazardous' material. Now I merely change the water very frequently as it is essentially free.
 
Last edited:
Another reason to avoid antibacterial products is that one of the major components of these products (triclosan) is thought to be an endocrine disruptor, a substance that can interfere with your body's endocrine and hormone systems.

From the FDA:
Animal studies have shown that triclosan alters hormone regulation. However, data showing effects in animals don’t always predict effects in humans. Other studies in bacteria have raised the possibility that triclosan contributes to making bacteria resistant to antibiotics.

In light of these studies, FDA is engaged in an ongoing scientific and regulatory review of this ingredient.
http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm205999.htm

Bleach as an antimicrobial agent is fine as it will neither contribute to antibiotic resistance nor act as an endocrine disruptor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo, lisab and Greg Bernhardt
Ygggdrasil said:
Bleach as an antimicrobial agent is fine as it will neither contribute to antibiotic resistance nor act as an endocrine disruptor.

Am I correct in thinking isopropyl alcohol (~70% solution) is similar to bleach, in those respects?
 
Ygggdrasil said:
Another reason to avoid antibacterial products is that one of the major components of these products (triclosan) is thought to be an endocrine disruptor, a substance that can interfere with your body's endocrine and hormone systems.

Bleach as an antimicrobial agent is fine as it will neither contribute to antibiotic resistance nor act aor.[/s an endocrine disruptQUOTE]
Ygggdrasil said:
Another reason to avoid antibacterial products is that one of the major components of these products (triclosan) is thought to be an endocrine disruptor, a substance that can interfere with your body's endocrine and hormone systems.

Tricolsan is a synthetic compound . Its method of action is as follows, from
http://toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Triclosan
Triclosan is a fat-soluble chemical and can easily cross cell membranes. Once inside the cell, triclosan poisons a specific enzyme that many bacteria and funguses need for survival. Triclosan blocks the active site of an enzyme called enoyl-acyl carrier-protein reductase (ENR for short), preventing the bacteria from manufacturing the fatty acids it needs for building cell membranes and other vital functions. Humans don't have this enzyme. One molecule of triclosan permanently disables an ENR molecule, which explains why triclosan has powerful antibiotic action even at very low concentrations (#General Chemistry online).

As an endocrine disruptor, there may not be any relavance for humans, as mentioned above, humans lack the enzyme.

Environmental concerns are where it displays some problematic features . It is thought to breakdown into dioxin under sunlight leading to a possible cancerous agent; it is quite now so prevalance in the environment is thought to have eco-system affects, especially near and downstream from waste water discharge, due to concentrations in the effluent; and of course the possibility of resistant organsims bcoming more prevalient due to wide spread use.

A typical study,
This study demonstrates that TCS has the potential to act as an endocrine disruptor in male mosquitofish
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20821571
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
I don't think that applies in the same way. You're killing pathogens before they get into your body, but only within the house. You still go out and about and are exposed to things in the air (which helps keep your immune system strong).

The "How clean is too clean" hygiene questions the "cleanliness is next to godliness " on its head, when gone too far overboard.
 
  • #10
Doug Huffman said:
Antiseptics are not so easily resisted in the concentrations allowed on inert surfaces. Sodium hypochlorite 'bleach' is prime among these. At lower concentrations, allowing some pathogen survival, resistant populations are favorably selected and can become the dominant strain.

Also alcohol, chlorhexidine (a favorite), quaternary ammoniums, boric acid, hydrogen peroxide (a favorite bleach from sodium perchlorate), peracetic acid, phenols (why paper toweling is effective), sodium chloride (weak diluted), sodium bicarbonate. Cold alcohol-CO2 vapor is used to clean ER/OR. Do not discount good ol' fashioned soap (contra detergent).

I clean bathroom/toilet surfaces with sodium hypochlorite bleach, not least for the bleaching action on metallic marks as from finger rings.

While I struggled to maintain my hot tub antiseptic, I used bromine rather than chlorine, and 'shocked' with potassium peroxymonosulfate (Oxone/potassium monopersulfate). I studied going to hydrogen peroxide, but shipping high grade H2O2 is expensive! as a 'hazardous' material. Now I merely change the water very frequently as it is essentially free.
Have you tried adding a silver ion concentration to the water?:-p
 
  • #11
lisab said:
Am I correct in thinking isopropyl alcohol (~70% solution) is similar to bleach, in those respects?
Yup, rubbing alcohol, Purell (which contains ethyl alcohol), hydrogen peroxide, and iodine are all examples of disinfectants that do not promote antibacterial resistance and are not known endocrine disruptors. If you want to avoid triclosan, you should check the label for the active ingredients. If the product contains triclosan, it will be listed there.

256bits said:
Tricolsan is a synthetic compound . Its method of action is as follows, from
http://toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Triclosan

As an endocrine disruptor, there may not be any relavance for humans, as mentioned above, humans lack the enzyme.

Just because triclosan was designed to target a bacterial enzyme does not mean that it targets only that bacterial enzyme. Part of the reason why most pharmaceutical drugs have side effects is that the molecules can bind to enzymes other than the enzyme that they're supposed to target. For example, the classic example of an endocrine disruptor, bisphenol A, was not even designed to target any protein (it was designed help harden plastics), yet it can bind to and affect hormone receptors in the body.

Whether triclosan causes adverse health effects in humans is not yet known, though evidence from animal studies suggests it could be harmful. However, triclosan is not an essential ingredient of the products containing it, and http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/expert-answers/triclosan/faq-20057861 (studies do show, however, that toothpastes containing triclosan are better at preventing gingivitis than regular toothpaste). Thus, weighting the benefits of triclosan (little to none) against the potential harm (contributes to antibacterial resistance, potentially an endocrine disruptor), I, personally, try to avoid using products containing triclosan.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lisab
  • #12
Ygggdrasil said:
Purell (which contains ethyl alcohol)
Excellent, I was thinking I'd have to ditch my hand sanitizers when traveling
 
  • #13
Ygggdrasil said:
Whether triclosan causes adverse health effects in humans is not yet known, though evidence from animal studies suggests it could be harmful.
Which is why I mentioned "may not" be harmful for humans.

Another animal study, for example, shows an "association"o_O.
A study on long term exposure - 6 months for mice evaluates to 18 years for humans, although the dose is not stated.
"Triclosan Associated with Liver Damage in Mice"
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/sep/2015/triclosan/index.cfm
No doubt, more study will be needed.

It is the prevalence in the environment that bothers me, and this is due to the substance at one time being added to market a product as a 99% bacterial killer.

As you, I tend to stay way from these products.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K